Tanglewood Case #2

1790 Words8 Pages
MEMORANDUM FOR Daryl Perrone, Director of Staffing Services, Tanglewood Inc. SUBJECT: Tanglewood EEO Investigation Analysis 1. A thorough analysis of Tanglewood's historical hiring and promotion records reveals that statistically Tanglewood has fostered disparate impact discrimination against not only African-American employees, but also non-White employees as a whole. The discrimination is more evidently clear in upper management levels. The existence of disparate impact discrimination at Tanglewood is determined when comparing the hiring and promotion rates of African-American employees and non-White employees versus the respective rates of White employees. In 1978 the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission enacted the Uniform Guidelines in Employee Selection Procedures which states: A selection rate for any race, sex, or ethnic group which is less than four-fifths (4/5) (or eighty percent) of the rate for the group with the highest rate will generally be regarded by the Federal enforcement agencies as evidence of adverse (disparate) impact, while a greater than four-fifths rate will generally not be regarded by Federal enforcement agencies as evidence of adverse (disparate) impact. Tanglewood has hired and promoted less than four-fifths or 80% of African-Americans and non-White employees compared to White employees at many occupational levels within the company. a. Flow Statistics of Selection Ratios. - In examining the external and internal selection ratios of African-American and non-White employees versus White employees at every position level within Tanglewood, it is revealed that disparate impact exists in 10 of the 18 categories overall and 6 of the 9 categories involving just African-American employees. - Disparate impact discrimination most clearly exists in upper
Open Document