“Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack of White Privilege” In Peggy McIntosh’s essay, she addressed several issues that are considered to be very important ones. She speaks of how whites are given hidden privileges, yet they don’t even realize it. I believe that the purpose for her writing this, was to bring out in the open the issues of oppression with regards to the dominant race and their “unearned privileges” that they are so oblivious to. McIntosh compared this situation to how men are more privileged and advantaged, and women are at a more disadvantaged state. In comparison, she also stated that men do indeed admit to a woman’s disadvantage, yet a man will not agree to being more advantaged, because they too are oblivious to this fact.
However, if it is proven their current practices are not an issue, they want to keep them in place. Disparate impact is defined as a theory of liability that prohibits an employer from using a facially neutral employment practice that has an unjustified adverse impact on members of a protected class. Based on this definition and the statistical evidence shown through flow and concentration analysis, Tanlgewood’s hiring practices clearly have an adverse impact. Using the 4/5th ratio, there is a clear underutilization of minorities. The applicant flow sheet was very revealing.
Angelou says, “ I have little hope for any splendid, rapid rapprochement between the races.” Angelou writes that there is a strong level of communication between blacks and whites, but still will never accept each other as equals. Angelou ends the article with, “ this is the beginning of silence; a long and dangerous silence.” Angelou thinks it’s practically hopeless, or will take a long time. Kapuscinski feels that in certain cities everybody has become one race, and that being equal isn’t hopeless. “ Here we see a revolution that is constructive.” Both articles address different issues on prejudice and experiencing an attempt to overcome racism through being
The Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody? Griggs v. Duke Power Company was heard by the Supreme Court. The plaintiff argued that his employer's requirement that coal handlers be high school graduates was unfairly discriminatory. In finding for the plaintiff, the Court ruled that discrimination need not be overt to be illegal, that employment practices must be related to job performance, and that the burden of proof is on the employer to show that hiring standards are job related. In Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, the Supreme Court ruled that the validity of job tests must be documented and that employee performance standards must be unambiguous.
He criticised the ruling arguing that it would do nothing to change the hearts and minds of southern white racists. He believed that it was counterproductive. It had just infuriated white citizens and whipped up tremendous opposition to Civil Rights. He claimed that his decision to make ‘Earl Warren’ Chief Justice was ‘the biggest damned-fool mistake I ever made’ Civil Rights Organisations: They began the fight for
I have the same opinion that racism still is present in the United States due to the fact that many races discuss other races, and at the largest part of the time, it is not good. The use of credit history to panel potential employees, which is still a common practice, can have a top-heavy blow on minorities. Although a number of states are creating things to limit discrimination against the unemployed and those with poor credit, we have a extensive way to go prior to these actions being done away with. With the intense lack of correspondence in seizures and imprisonment rates among the ethnicities, some have recognized that using convictions and arrest to prohibit people from service may have a contrasting bang on minorities. On the other hand, a large amount of states currently permit unlawful accounts to be utilized to reject experienced candidates.
But if we think about it, without the Voting Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act, things might have never of changed. African Americans could still be treated like slaves and not treated like human beings. America would still be a very segregated place. Freedom Summer was a very dark time in American history but all in all, America has turned out pretty good. It’s no doubt that America was not the most favorable place during this time period for most, if not all African Americans.
Historical Report on Race, Asian Americans While Asian Americans "only" make up about 5% of the U.S.'s population as of 2008, they are one of the fastest growing racial/ethnic groups (in terms of percentage increase) in the U.S. The Asian American community has received a lot of scrutiny over the years but in many ways, still remains misunderstood. As many social scientists have noted, there are two primary stereotypes that continue to affect Asian Americans. One is that all Asian Americans are the same. That is, many people are either unable or unwilling to distinguish between different Asian ethnicities -- Korean American from a Japanese American, Filipino American from an Indonesian American, etc.
From the research, I think it is also fair to say that Texas has an immigration issue as 46 percent of their homeless children are Hispanic, a larger number than any other state in America. The next comparison I will make is between Indiana and neighboring Ohio. Ohio is ranked 10 spots better than Indiana while much of Ohio’s numbers paint a darker picture than those of Indiana. Again, I believe that because Ohio is in the early stages of planning to reduce child and family homelessness their “grade” is better than Indiana who, like Texas, has no plan in
Affirmative action entails giving minorities a head start in areas like higher education and employment; sometimes referred to as positive discrimination. However to more conservative groups and many Republican politicians it can be seen as reverse discrimination, patronising to minorities and unfair to majorities. The first programme of affirmative action was brought in by Kennedy in 1961, the creation of the Equal Employment Opportunity Council (EEOC), this ensured the hiring and employment practices would be free from racial bias. Affirmative action tends to be largely supported by the Democrats, with the belief of ‘Equality of Results vs. Equality Opportunity’ in that the burdens of racism can only be overcome by taking race into account.