Yell explains the current laws and regulations on disciplining students in special education. Throughout the chapter Yell breaks down the different aspects of discipline in schools in regards to special education. Yell starts out explaining the procedural due process used to create fair polices. Yell also talks about how schools are given the power to act as parent for the child while they are at school. This does not mean that parents have no rights to what happens to their child while they are at school but this allows school to guide student behaviors though discipline.
Henderson Community College expects students and faculty to honor, and faculty to enforce, these academic principles. The College affirms that it will not tolerate academic dishonesty including, but not limited to, violation of academic rights of students and student offenses. (Rules of the Community College Senate, Section VII and Code of Student Conduct, Article II). Information about the academic rights of students and academic offenses and students’ right to appeal can be found in the KCTCS Code of Student Conduct on the HCC Webpage:
By allowing certain behaviors to occur without consequences the teacher is sending the message that it is okay. This can cause the students to lose focus and a decrease in understanding of the lesson being taught. It can also allow chaos to reign supreme. Disruptions can also make other students feel threatened. Students must feel safe and secure in their class in order to learn and grow in education.
A teacher may be able to do a lot of things to avoid behavior problems. I believe in few well-defined rules and lots of procedures. Structure in the classroom and procedures that the students know how to follow will provide stability. When the students know what is expected of them then there is a natural flow to the classroom. The stability in the classroom is necessary to meet basic needs of students.
CYP Core 33 5.2 Outline the policies and procedures that should be followed in response to concerns or evidence of bullying and explain the reasons why they are in place The Department of Education is clear that no form of bullying should be tolerated. The current anti-bullying guidance for schools is ‘Safe to Learn: embedding anti-bullying work in schools’. We strongly abide by the anti-bullying policy. Everyone has the right to feel welcome, secure and happy. Bullying of any sort stops members of the setting from being able to achieve their full potential and prevents equality of opportunity.
School uniforms are to be used to limit skin exposure and anything gang related to prevent anything that might harm students or symbolize anything unsafe. In some cases, students rebel and try to make the uniform look according to the way they want to be portrayed as but the reality in that is that the policy isn’t going to let them do this. Students need to oblige to the uniforms given to them and not complain because it can get much worse than just putting on a simple shirt that you have to wear every day. Take for instance IDEA School; their uniform policy is VERY strict and they only allow you to wear what they want you to wear not what you think belongs to the uniform. In this school, the students are only allowed to wear the school t-shirt, cakey pants, closed toed shoes, and a belt that won’t let your pants sag down to your knees or farther.
The Darwin High School dress code allows students to express their unique individuality; students of Darwin High School have the right of free expression. Students are given the opportunity to seen as individuals but the dress code keeps students dressing appropriately to show respect to the teachers of the school. One of the main purposes of the school’s dress code is to protect the student’s individual safety. The dress code’s implementation is fair and sensible, is shows that the school does not tolerate students who choose to rebellious and break the school’s dress code. Darwin High School’s dress code gives students the freedom to express their personality but also sets boundaries for students to comply.
On appeal, the Court said the "school official exception" to the probable cause requirement for a warrantless search does not apply when the search is carried out at the behest of the police. Here, despite the S.R.O. 's apparently dual role as a school official and a law enforcement officer, the fact that she acted at the behest of a police officer requires the State to prove either that the search was conducted pursuant to a valid consent or probable cause existed to believe that the student had violated the law and had in his possession evidence of that violation. II. GENERAL STUDENT-WIDE SAFETY OR ADMINISTRATIVE SEARCHES Warrantless searches in the public school environment involving groups of students are sometimes “reasonable” under the Fourth Amendment despite a lack of suspicion particular to any individual student.
Any student who failed to follow the policy would be sent home immediately and suspended until they decided to follow the schools policy. The families of those fellow students didn’t decide to file a lawsuit until after the Iowa Civil Liberties Union approached their family, and ACLU agreed to help the family with their case. The parents in turn, filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court, which upheld the decision of the Des Moines school board. The courts seven to two decision held that the first amendment applied to public schools, and that administrators would have to demonstrate constitutionally valid reasons for any specific regulation of speech in the classroom. The court observed, " it can hardly be argued that either students or
Behavior Improvement Contract I, ________________ agree to abide by the rules and regulations of the County Code of Conduct and the Middle School Student Handbook. I will also abide by the classroom rules and regulations that are required by my classroom teachers. I understand that I am on a “Behavior Improvement Contract” and that any repeated misconduct by me will not be tolerated. My continuous misconduct could result in a disciplinary action. I understand that I am fully aware of and will be expected to abide by the following: 1.