Social Problem Construction

282 Words2 Pages
Parnaby, P (2003). Disaster through Dirty Windshields Law, Order and Toronto's Squeegee Kids. Canadian Journal of Sociology. Vol. 28 (3), p281-307 In this paper, I summarise the main arguments and conclusion put forth in the article, state what I have learned about the social construction of social problems and comment on the insights it provided into issues and problems in the Caribbean. Article Summary Patrick Parnaby in his article “Disaster through Dirty Windshields Law, Order and Toronto's” focuses on the construction of “squeegee kids” (homeless youths who wash car windscreens for a living) as a social problem which relied on rhetorical and idiomatic processes, a process which also influenced the subsequent implementation of legislation to combat the problem. Utilizing printed material gathered from various sources, Parnaby examined the typological creation of the term “squeegee kids”; from the coining of the label to the varied and colourful descriptions that was used to identify them and simultaneously disassociate them for the larger homeless youth population. To forward the point of eminent disaster, the author stated that anti-squeegee claim-makers and journalist placed emphasis on the size of the problem, the demeanour and appearance of the youths and public fear in an attempt to “ground” the problem and further validate their interest. He employed a contextual constructionist approach which allowed him to not be strictly subjective in his analysis but permitting some amount of objective observations to be made about the process. References were made to the pro-squeegee rhetoric but it was not explored as it was not the focus of the article. The author aims to highlight claims-making activity/process which influences the view we have of the
Open Document