That peer review was vague. It echoed the first review without a lot of details that will help better my paper. I made an effort to revise my paper. I incorporated my peers review into it. I gave more details about the relationship between MacFarland and Mike.
Knauft tells it in a compelling way that not only discloses the fate of yet another tribal culture, but — if read perceptively — affords a disconcerting mirror in which to recognize our own. c. Are there topics that he might have handled differently or that he did not address at all which you feel should have been included? Your paper should then discuss and demonstrate your comprehension of one of the following topics: a. The nature of Gebusi violence Gebusi believed in giving gifts to visitors who come with peaceful/good intentions. Gebusi relationships were defined by things that one gave or did not give to others.
How can not knowing the proper terminology affect you as you conduct criminal justice research? If there is a misunderstanding of previous research, the results could reflect on an officers daily duties; such as, incident reports, investigations, negotiations, interviews, and interrogations. Researchese is a language of research that includes concepts and variables to represent operationalization and hypotheses in research. * If common terminology is not understood completely, it would be difficult to understand data collection regardless of how it was collected. To both understand research and conduct new research is it vital that each person involved understands the terminology associated with research and research techniques.
The article is written about the body ritual of the Nacirema. The author, Horace Miner, explains the role that culture plays in the development of stereotypes and prejudices. The author also focuses on seeing one’s culture through a different perspective. Miner begins with addressing how anthropologists are no longer surprised by people’s behavior because of the familiarity with diversity. The author then makes a point about how some exotic customs are yet to be discovered.
I did not choose the harsher step of informing the journal, and giving them my results. I decided that since I wasn’t completely sure of what had happened, I was going to give Dr Waters a little leeway,by seeing if our in house investigation turned up anything. Thenmy next step would be to show all the data to the journal. . In the end I believe I took a low risk, and still had the option to report the findings to the journal, should the need be there.
4. How much formality does my audience prefer? * Considering that I do not have substantial information regarding the primary individual in question, I am unable to 100% determine how much formality he would require. My secondary audience, Human Resource, should have formal communication in order to properly document the issue at hand. 5.
Although, the males in this tribe would have male to male sexual contact they were required to marry a woman when they have come to age of twenty or so. The practice is customary for young male’s to acquire the necessary skills to become a great hunter or leader. Once this is accomplished the male will have sexual contact only with women. This cultural perspective in my opinion, can give the younger males a mixed message. By teaching them be involved with male to male sexual contact could unlock a sexual attraction to a male.
Also, what made you interested in this tradition? What questions were you seeking to address? You may also describe your initial impressions and how those impressions changed throughout your experience. Methodology: How did you carry out your field research? Did you run into any logistical or cross-cultural hurdles or issues with people’s personalities that made it difficult to effectively conduct research?
It’s unclear how Hume thinks of names, words or language as a whole. According to Hume’s theory, we must at least have impressions (and the corresponding ideas) of the spoken or written manifestations of words. Obviously, something unites these different impressions of manifestations of a word for us to know that they are the same word with the same meaning. But under Hume’s system, we are left with a circular explanation: the concept of the word is defined by the customary application of the word to itself. Under this conception, language is not an adequate tool to determine which particulars belong within a concept.
He uses the lists to compare the difference of people’s points of view about the field that he was in, with his own. This is so he can explain his theory to the reader, and it also shows his logical and organised thought process. In addition, it shows the reader that his point of view is much more defined and accurate. There are a few words that have been formatted in bold, such as “Shakespeare’s Globe” and “CROW APTOK” so that Christopher can get across to the audience that these words are important. Christopher also writes his first joke, despite the fact that he said he doesn’t like jokes in chapter thirteen.