How is the research process and terminology in the criminal justice field related to you within your career path? How is new terminology helpful in assisting you and how is it affecting you when you are unaware? These questions often come to mind when considering taking on any research topic and doesn’t need to only apply to the criminal justice world. However that being said we will look further into the different types of terminologies that are related to the criminal justice field and just how the research process benefits those members of this field accordingly. The research process is very complex and pending the individual conducting the research it can take several steps from beginning to end.
We must be sure that finding those answers are done ethically from the crime scene to trial. The Investigator Ethical Considerations From the moment the investigator gets a case professionalism, knowledge of laws and procedure is what has to be followed. If at any time the investigator became biased and used emotion instead of just facts of the case could be compromised. Remaining unbiased in either homicide or rape can be extremely difficult for even the most ethical investigators. Handling evidence properly is one of the most crucial points of any investigation.
When misconduct or mistakes are made it can have very damaging effects on individuals and their lives, but also to the credibility of the criminal justice system. This can happen and does on occasion (Meyer & Grant, 2003). How can we improve consistency in how prosecutors accept case work? When assessing possible improvements to the consistency of how prosecutors accept case work, there are no simple answers. Putting strict demands on what a prosecutor
Criminal justice administrators make important decisions daily, which can have profound effects on our lives (Gleason, 2006). Within the criminal justice administration critical thinking also play an important role along side with ethical and professional behavior. Within criminal justice law enforcement, corrections, and courts all use critical thinking to make ethical and professional decisions. Police officers must use critical thinking to conclude how the law was broken, how to respond, and if to arrest a person or not. When a police officer does not use critical thinking that is where problems can arise.
When it comes to understanding the arts and sciences and creating and developing a research program, one must keep in mind the importance and concerns of the treatment of participants and ethical conduct. Research can be defined as being the gift of intellect, curiosity, and skill, all coming together to arouse one’s desire to investigate questions, explore, and create new processes or products that will be beneficial for all individuals and society as a whole. While keeping in mind how important research is, it must be remembered that participants play a very important role in research and helping to find answers to the why’s, what’s, when’s, and how’s questions posed in stemming research activities. It is also very important that research participants be treated ethically and with the greatest respect, when choosing to participate in research projects. Ethics is a very important part of the context for compliance.
There are many different important parts when any individual is describing the research process with in criminology as well as being familiar with the criminal justice research methods terminology as well. Having the knowledge of proper terminology can be very useful when evaluating, and analyzing research studies or data. To not understand the proper terminology and the basic information while conducting any type of research can and will affect the researchers report in which can turn into the wrong information on the study or data that needs to be collected. There are a lot of things that could go wrong if any researcher does not fully understand what needs to be understood. When researchers fully understand all terminology and are more
This research paper will attempt to answer these questions to better understand the nature of repressed memories and their place in the legal system. An in-depth analysis of important research being done on the topic will shed more light on repressed memories. Before we begin to look at research on repressed memories, it is important to fully understand what the term means. According to Elizabeth Loftus in her article, “The Myth of Repressed Memory”, repressed memories are memories that are not “simply forgotten” nor “deliberately kept secret.” The idea is that when a traumatic event happens to somebody, that person’s mind could react by “removing the memory” from his/her “consciousness.” However, once the mind removes this memory from a person’s consciousness, the memory is not permanently gone; it can come back to that person later in life. This is the definition of repressed memories used by most researchers.
In order to fully appreciate the importance of this process, the history that led to its inclusion in research projects must be understood. Although informed consent is designed to make sure that a participant fully understands the procedures, benefits, and risks involved in an experiment, it is not without its flaws in its practical application. There are many covert communication barriers between participants and researchers that lead to misunderstandings. This prevents participants from making the fully autonomous decisions sought for in the informed consent process. Some of those barriers are related to cultural aspects such as language differences and religious dogma.
If you fail these you cannot proceed. There are some departments that require more testing. Things like passing a polygraph examination, taking an individual's credit score, personal history, and residency within the all into consideration. However these things must be treaded on lightly as they border discrimination and other issues (Grant & Terry, 2008). There are reasons why the selection process for a police officers are so extensive.
If such identifications are excluded, police will begin to use only reliable identification procedures. A wealth of research has been done on why mis-identifications occur and what the best practices are to minimize the possibility of mis-identifications – why shouldn’t we insist that police use these best practices and insist that only reliable testimony be admitted at trial? "An in-court identification of an accused is inadmissible if a suggestive out-of-court identification procedure created a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification." In considering whether error is harmless, a case's particular facts must be considered along with various factors including: "the importance of the witness' testimony in the prosecution's case, whether the testimony was cumulative, the presence or absence of evidence corroborating or contradicting the testimony of the witness on material points, the extent of cross-examination otherwise permitted, and, of course, the overall strength of the prosecution's