Empire Building Comparison The process of empire building in the Spanish Empire and in the Russian Empire was similar and different in many ways. While Spain and Russia were similar in their process of conquest, they differed in the way they ran the empire from 1450 to 1800. The way of conquest used by Spain was very similar to Russia. Both Spain and Russia used weapons to conquer more land. Russia used modern weapons of their time to conquer more land for more fur.
Russia and Germany both have a multi-party system that is being controlled by one party, causing their distribution of authority to be slightly more concentrated than it should be. General Information The semi-presidential system used in Russia is relatively new and was established in hopes to avoid some of the weaknesses seen in Parliamentary and Presidential systems. In Russia, the head of state (the President) and the head of government (the Prime Minister) share the power of the executive. This aspect of the head of state and head of government sharing the executive power is what distinguishes Russia’s semi-presidential system from the others. The President is elected by a voting process similar to those in Presidential systems.
A Tale of Two Tsars: Comparisons of the Regimes of Tsars Ivan IV and Peter I Philip Jia Perhaps no two rulers in the history of Russia before the Revolution of 1917 capture the image in one’s mind of the Tsar as completely as Ivan IV (“The Terrible”) and Peter I (“The Great”). Their very mention summons iconic images of the fearsome power and horrific excesses of the Russian monarchy from a Western perspective, while from a Russian perspective they evoke the idea of a “model” for absolutist rule, a mythos carefully fostered by the government during the Soviet period. In particular, the reign of Ivan IV has long been held up, at least in Western memory, as a key example of what is thought to be a long history of abusive Russian absolutism. Yet, while the rule of the former Tsar is often described as one of Russia’s most calamitous and that of the latter thought of as one of its finest, Ivan IV and Peter I had much more in common than is normally thought to be the case. Both Tsars were thoroughly progressive, bringing reform to Russian bureaucracies and institutions that had slowly stagnated.
In every organization, groups of people are forced to work together regardless of whether or not they like it. Some groups become cohesive while others do not. And sometimes, this cohesion can be a bad thing. The Bagel Hockey case is a prime example of group cohesion being damaging to the workplace. Cohesion was easily attainable for the weekend work group because of the similarities in the employees’ external statuses.
Mongol Rule in China vs. Russia Due to the Mongols ultimate desire for economic power, the Mongols highly affected both Russia and China in both political and economic aspects. When the Mongols invaded both territories, they destroyed a lot and the key differences and similarities come from how it became reconstructed. Many similarities in politics and economics arose such as the way the facilitated trade, and how their economies dropped. However, many differences occurred like the way they ran the governments, their centers of power, and how the Mongols fell from both states. In many ways, both states were extremely similar in the way Mongols ruled them.
However, countries can be not only liberal democratic or illiberal. A good example of this is Russia which has both liberal and illiberal democratic features and thus, it can be said that Russia is an authoritarian and democratic hybrid. Russia today not only holds regular elections and has a multiparty system; furthermore, according to constitution, Russia has separated
It can be argued that despite a dramatic shift in power between 1855 and 1964, there was also a lot of continuity and that this continuity outweighed the change in Russia. Although new leaders and a new form of system came to fruition after the 1917 revolution, autocracy still remained to some extent, repression was still rife and ideology was only slightly different. In the sense that autocracy means a government headed by a ruler with unlimited power, there was little change in the way that Russia was ruled between 1855 and 1964. Government structure and institutions between 1855 and 1964 demonstrated both continuity and change. Ultimately both Romanov Tsars and Bolshevik leaders followed a hierarchal structure whereby officials and organs of government were all answerable to both the Tsars and communist leaders.
Confederation and Constitution Both the article of Confederation and the New Constitution of 1787 had their strength and weaknesses. The article of Confederation has given the state a lot of power, which will lead to the New Constitution. Many believe that was the right thing to do, in the next paragraph we will compare the strength and weakness of both and also look in details why they had to go with the New Constitution of 1787. The article of Confederation was first adopted on November 15, 2007 by the United States. The thirteen states had to make some ratification of it and that didn’t occur until March 1, 1781.
Who were also looking to become in power. Trotsky was the main reason the Bolsheviks had survived as the Bolsheviks government due to Trotsky being the commander for the red army. He also had support from Lenin who was leading the red army with total discipline; those who were willing to fight were promoted and those who turned out to be cowards were exiled. Trotsky and Lenin were both smart during the civil war as they had a upper hand with resources as they were closer to them as their opposition were so far away. This was an advantage for the red army as it was easy to communicate which helped them in the battle fields and be much easier to be successful in the war without communication they weren’t able to come up with tactics and plan how they would attack the whites, also railway support would bring the army weapons and food supplies very quickly.
The Tsar had advisers, but he was not bound to listen to their advice, and laws were made by imperial decree. This total power made the Romanov dynasty, which ruled Russia from 1613 to 1917. There are some factors to take into account that say that Russia did begin to move in the direction of a parliamentary system of government, including the fact there was an elective local government called the zemstva. The zemstva was created during the reign of Alexander II, and consisted of elected officials – 74% of which were nobles. Even so, the zemstvo did allow the greater population more say in the ways they wanted a small part of their lives to be run.