It is inhumane to keep animals in small enclosures like that where they wouldn’t even get room to stretch their legs or get the chance to behave like they would naturally in the wild. The more intelligent animals (dogs, cats, pigs, primates etc) suffer from severe cases of loneliness because they lack the rights to run around and be free. How would you feel if you could not run around in a free environment? My second argument is using animals for testing cosmetics. It is estimated that over 1 million animals are killed due to companies that test their products on animals and those companies tell us that they use animals to test the safety of their products.
Disagree argument with Chu Hsien-jer After reading “Film Addresses Taiwan’s Lack of Respect for Animals,” I find that I disagree with what Chu has said. First of all, Chu claims that “[w]e have animal protection laws, but Taiwan's law enforcement is far from satisfactory.” Chu brings out the issue only, but he doesn’t tell us how to solve this problem. On the other hand, Chu talks about the impairing animal in the interview throughout his life experience, whereas his father’s friend abandoned several pet dogs and some of which suffered from a skin disease to show us we overlook the right of animals, but be curious how one man’s experience can represent public. Furthermore, Chu tries to use terms such as “always” and “anything” in the following sentence, “Consider conversations [held between people who live in Taiwan] are always about real estate prices and the stock market. Because people don't care about anything but economic development, they overlook animal rights[,]” to emphasize his own theory by this form of hyperbole.
The Horsemeat scandal contravenes the law as many company’s such as ‘Tesco’, ‘Iceland’, ‘Lidl’ and ‘Aldi’ were misleading their customers into thinking they sold beef whereas in fact they were caught selling horse meat which was a breach of the law. Consumer protection from unfair trading regulation 2008 also limits marketing as customers have a right to be treated fairly and honestly. Therefore aggressive sales tactics and dishonest promotions are strictly not allowed. Advertising special offers that aren't in stock is called bait advertising. An example of this is a camera shop runs a national advertising campaign offering cameras at a low price compared to its competitors.
[animal-testing.procon.org] Researchers in Aston University have made it known that it is not worth taking the lives of these animals for testing, because the things we’re trying to make happen with human bodies is very different from the animal body. The anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and people make animals poor models for human beings. There is a big percentage from the 1950’s up till now that animal testing is flawed by not being correct when it is given to the people it is for. So why not just stop the animal experiments that are not just killing, but also torturing the animals.
“Animals do not reason like humans and cannot vote.” Chu asserts, “[b]ut they have all sorts of feelings just like others.” This is apparently his personal assumption, without a solid scientific base to support. Chu also analyzes that “people [in Taiwan] lack respect for life and see animals as merely lifeless objects,” though he cannot possibly know exactly what other people think. Moreover, Chu
It is passed from generation to generation, but it is up to the new generations if they want to follow it or not. Culture is important but not all traditions are completely right, as for example bullfighting. I myself attended just one bullfight in my life, and that was only to get a sense of the bull's suffering. Bullfighting is cruel, against animal welfare, and day by day there are less people in favor of bullfighting which make me think that it should not be allowed nowadays. People should respect culture because it is what we are, but not all traditions are accepted for everybody because of the cruel treatment on animals, as for example bullfighting.
This system is flawed as it was never designed to ensure animal welfare. The animals are being whipped, their heads beaten onto concrete blocks and their throats only half-slit and died lingering deaths on these voyages. We, however, can change this. Now, in support of passing this bill to end live animal exports, I would like to present several ethical reasons why we should look at moving away from this cruel treatment of our animals. Firstly, the fate of our animals during transportation.
His stupidity blocks him from realising that he could rally all the farm animals to rebel against the tyrannical pigs. The other horse, Mollie, ‘the foolish, pretty white mare’ is possibly the most stupid animal on the farm but she is very lucky because she manages to escape Animal Farm before Napolean becomes a fully fledged tyrant. The fact that the rest of the animals, besides the pigs, do not trust their own instinct or even themselves contributes to their exploitation by the pigs. The animals are so gullible, that instead of questioning Napolean, they reproach and resolve to work harder and please him more. This is evident in their building of the windmill.
Animal cruelty needs to stop and if farmers aren’t willing to stop the nasty, brutal way they are killing animals, then what we can do is stop buying meat. Maybe not all at once but we could slowly stop buying so much. Along with that, we would also need to stop going to zoos and circuses. A lot of people think animals do not have feelings, but they do. They know when someone is being nice or being mean.
He states that the worst thing about being poor isn’t because of not having enough food but not having enough money to support him in difficult times. He even motivates himself by thinking “being hungry makes food taste better” (8). The worst thing happened to him that makes him hates being poor is when his family doesn’t have enough money to bring their dog to the doctor. By saying “I want to hate dad and mom for our poverty. I wanted to blame them for my sick dog and for all the other sickness in the world.” Although he doesn’t want to blames his parent and their previous generation to have born in a poor situation, he doesn’t have any order choice.