He insisted that when government violates individual rights, people may legitimately rebel. Locke believed that human nature is characterized by reason and tolerance. That everyone had natural rights from the moment that they were born. Natural rights were life, liberty, and property. He believed that the government had an obligation to protect the citizens natural rights.
Personality and moral self explain how and why human beings make free choices. The libertarianism theory has been explained by CA Campbell, who said that human beings see themselves as free agents and therefore accept moral responsibility for their actions. Humans must accept responsibility for these actions and face any consequences that may come their way. John Stuart Mill - an influencal figure in Liberatarianism – believe we are free and morally responsible for all our actions. Mill believed it was extremely important that an indivduals free will should not be crushed by society.
Disadvantages for the service provider The disadvantage will be that we have to tolerate the life style choices of other people, because poor choices lead to poor outcomes. Social justice Advantages for the service user The advantage for service user might be that the service user doesn’t have to be worried about, that someone will laugh at their race, religion, etc. They can feel good how they are. Disadvantages for the service user The service user may meet the service provider, which doesn’t tolerate people from different countries. Advantages for the service provider Disadvantages for the service provider A service provider might not tolerate a person, which is different race, gender, religion, etc.
* Locke believed that political power was not given by to the monarch by god, but was derived from social compacts that people made to preserve their natural rights. 1. Natal rights (to life, liberty, and property) * He believed that government should in effect, be instituted to make sure that the people were able to secure their rights to property. That
However, it is clear that egoism is compatible and can overlap with moral actions. The first reason why egoism is compatible and can overlap with moral actions is that agreements can be made in order to mutually benefit all people. This is called a social contract and can be explained as a set of rules that limit any threat that others may pose which are set by egoists. John Locke brought an idea of “the state of nature” in the “Two treatises of government”, which suggests that “no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possession”. Locke believes that humans have natural rights to life, liberty and property but as a society, we live in, can be corrupted, these rights can be broken apart.
Whitman wroted that the governments role was to be "... not of an officious intermeddler in the affairs of men, but of a prudent watchman who prevents outrage," that is strengthened by his underlying logic that "... although government can do little positive good to the people, it may do an immense deal of harm." (Whitman) Simply put, if the governemnt has less has to do with meddling in peoples affairs and rights then society will be better off. Also that the role of the government is to act as a protector of smaller groups and individuals from bigger groups so everyone will be happy. The basis of laissez-faire is that the bigger the government factor, being it’s rights and powers, the worse of the country is. William Graham Sumner was another supporter of the laissez-faire idea.
This way he will not waste his time and not making a bad impression on other people as well. The most selfish person will lie often about themselves doing stuff just to benefit them instead of others. Even though he knows certain things are wrong, but because of his selfishness, he chooses to trust the lies. The purpose of lies is maintaining social connections, protecting loved one’s feeling and being plain selfish. Sometimes a person does not want to hurt
We as citizens have the right to live life in freedom without undue harm and to pursue our dreams and goals. Jefferson believes the government needs to respect our opinion by not putting it aside and to just listen to the citizens. The citizens have the right to set up a new government so the citizens have a better political life. To achieve the happiness we desire, the need for possession would be required. Jefferson says, “We hold these truths to be self-evidence, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness” (Jefferson, 80).
The idea of legal paternalism in ethical reasoning is somewhat of a kind gesture from the Government to try to help individuals from themselves in the assumption that those individuals do not know what is best for them. But, forcing individuals to paternalistic laws in order to protect them is limiting their natural born rights and is unconstitutional. The Government must respect people's choices because respecting individuals choices manifest a respect for them as liberated individuals protected by the constitution of the United States. Government should not interfere with people's personal lives; because
John Locke stated that government existed for the reason of protecting "property", which he defined as a person's "life, liberty, and estate". he wrote that power was limited to preserving a person's "civil interest", which he described as "life, liberty, health,; and the possession of outward things" .He declared "the highest perfection of intellectual nature lies in a careful and constant pursuit of true and solid