How does he get Roderigo to accept his conclusions? What keeps Roderigo from seeing the truth?| 4.|What plans does Iago set up with Roderigo?| 5.|Read Iago's soliloquy (2.1.273-299) carefully. What new reasons does Iago give for hating Othello? What emotion seems to be governing Iago's thoughts and actions? How is Cassio involved in Iago's feelings?
1. What question do you ask for claims of fact? * A) Did it happen? * B) What is it? * C) Is it good or bad?
Where does King’s tone shift? What effect is produced by the change? 9. What is King's tone in the opening paragraph? How might you make an argument for its being ironic?
3. How does Davis refute this theory? He uses the divine names, syle and vocabulary, the documents, and then internal evidence. 4. Give several examples of external evidences for Mosaic authorship?
I think that Antony is up to something. Antony tries to get the crowd to support him, by making Brutus look disloyal. I just knew that Antony couldn’t be trusted. Now we have killed him. I just hope that the other conspirators can see it my way.
5. How did he justify entrusting people with the right to revolt? 6. What are the deficiencies in his theory of political obligation? Sources of Material: The researcher in this paper has relied on primary as well as secondary sources of material such as books, articles, journals, etc.
He then describes rhetorical discourses through the words of others that have attempted to define it, and providing insight to what he feels they mean. Basically what it boils down to in the opening part is that these two men that defined rhetorical are both wrong and right, proving each other along the way. Grant decided he wanted to further develop the idea of rhetorical discourse. Exigence - a problem or need that can be dealt with a forum of communication. Proposed 3 questions to ask: “..what the discourse is about, why is it needed, and what it should accomplish.” (106).
The devices work together to convince the crowd that Caesar being the better and more legitimate ruler, has previously connected with the Romans in a proffessional ethical way as well as connecting with them an emotional way. Antony's use of red herring actually lights the light bulb for the crowd of Rome. The fact that he draws attention to the central issue of Brutus killing caesar and his death affecting Rome, brings the crowd
2. What is the argument the writer is trying to make (what is his claim or conclusion)? What are his premises?) 3. Examine the premises; do they contain fallacies?
* Select key scenes, soliloquies or monologues then deconstruct in detail for techniques and how they have been uses to reveal/expose/challenge/confront perspectives * Identify the conflict that surrounds Caesar and who constructs the conflict * Assess Brutus’ role and internal conflict * Assess Cassius’ revengeful and aggressive stance as a find suggest how he has been used as a foil to Antony or Brutus’ perspectives * How is Cassius’ anger and frustration and fear and need for regicide explored in the text? * Who argues against regicide and why? * Why are the perspectives of Caesar differing across the characters – as a man, as a leader, as a monarch – and how do these differ from Caesar’s own