If the child’s parents are not educated then it can be said that they may not understand the school system and may not support the school. In conclusion, we can say that although other factors may play a role, teacher labelling is the main cause of underachievement in Britain today as this determines the set that a child is placed in in Year 7 which in turn influences their whole educational
Assess the strengths and limitations of unstructured interviews for the study of pupil subcultures A subculture is a group of people within society who share norms, values, beliefs, and attitudes that are in some ways different from or opposed to the mainstream culture e.g. an anti-school subculture formed by pupils in lower streams. In this essay I will be asses the strengths and limitations of unstructured interviews for the study of pupil subcultures. An unstructured interview is that mainly open ended questions with no fixed set questions that produces qualitative data and is free flowing like a guided conversation. There are a number of strengths and limitations of using unstructured interviews to study pupil subcultures.
Then, it means the teacher treats the pupil accordingly acting as if the predications are already true. The pupils internalise the teacher’s expectations of their self-concept so that they actually become the kind of pupil that the teacher believed them to be when labelling. If the teacher believes that a pupil will fail, they more than likely will fail because they have been labelled to be a ‘failure’. Although, this is not always the case, some people will also be labelled like a failure but they will try and prove the teachers wrong and will try their hardest to pass
As it says in Item A, a subculture is a group of pupils who share similar values and attitudes. Some subcultures are pro-school, while some are anti-school. An unstructured interview is when the interviewer has freedom to vary the questions they ask. There are a number of strengths and weaknesses of using unstructured interviews to interview children, and they will be examined below. Unstructured interviews allow the interviewer to build rapport with the pupils, unlike questionnaires where there is no chance to build rapport because the researcher has limited contact with the pupils.
According to material in item A, sociologists such as Becker claim that teachers label different groups of pupils and treat them unequally. Labelling in education means attaching a meaning to a student i.e. calling them hard working or mischievious. Researchers want to know whether labelling actually happens and how much it affects people's self-esteem and achievement. There are various types of experiments that are used to research this, however comparitive experiments should not be used as we are only studying a group of people in education, not the whole population.
t identifies two groups that are similar and comparisons are made- it seeks to discover cause and effect, avoids artificiality, can be used to study past events, no ethical problems . If studying labelling in schools which is a social process of teachers attaching positive or negative labels to students and students also doing this to teachers, this is best understood in the context of social interaction in the classroom. This would eliminate lab experimentation and would be favoured by interactionists using a field experiment approach. Main ideas concepts Some researchers have used laboratory experiments-Harvey and Stains, they looked at whether teachers had preconceived ideas about pupils of different social classes. The study indicated labelling goes on and that the labels are used to pre-judge pupils potential.
Payne stated that students should learn the “hidden rules” of the middle class from their educators so that they have another set of rules to use if they choose to do so. Impoverished students, compared to students of middle or upper class, often have a lack of proper funding, thus, a lack of appropriate resources to use in their education. Due to this, they are often unprepared for school, not having the money to purchase books and other educational tools. Both authors realize this, but argue that the responsibility lies on different shoulders. Payne states that impoverished students face inequality at school, insinuating that the school should be responsible for helping to provide for these students so that they can have a better education.
Many teachers do not like “catching plagiarists and bringing them to academic justice.” As she states, it is not hard to just cite the author that originally had the information you are using (Bojar). Plagiarism is becoming a big problem in the school system. Many students do not understand what needs to be cited and what does not. The school system should teach students the proper way to cite, and they should teach them that copy and pasting is not writing a paper. According Bojar to students at the community college have a hard time juggling classes along with his or her family and a job.
765 This won't just bring about understudies and general people to feel or see the isolation proceeding in the get ready arrangement that happens on grounds. Moves that should be made are that can't avoid being that school's staff is more included from allowing such things to happen. Some may think they are doing the privilege to talk unreservedly while a greater part share sees what it shows up, and that is isolation proceeding in grounds. All understudies should feel level with and not accept that the school support such things because it has each and every negative effect on the schools appearance, and how the understudies opinions are being toyed with to just start a dialog. It is greatly wrong for some to claim the privilege to talk openly is the time when one imparts; be that as it may, when others get harm, offended by such remarks is going too far.
Flunking students can be used as a positive tool by our education system. The consequence of flunking and holding students back alone can be used to motivate and encourage students to put full effort into class work. Most students fear flunking only because they’re afraid of what friends, peers and society will say or think about them; this is all wrong, the real fear should be failing and not being