Definition: Leadership styles may also be known as management styles. They are the approaches that people use when directing and motivating people to achieve a task. The leadership styles we are most interested in are outlined as follows and only bad leaders will stick to one predominant style. Good leaders will change their style according to the circumstances and situation they are dealing with: • Authoritarian This style is used when the leader wants to achieve a task quickly. S/he will just tell the team or individuals what s/he wants to be done, when to do it and even how to do it without consultation from the team members.
Using our ethics can allow us to be acceptable of the choices we make. As people we are all faced with faults or imperfections, That is what makes us unique. It's what and how we fix our mistakes that make us different. In the Ethical Lens Inventory, my blind spot stated that " I believed my motives justified methods or my good was good enough." Meaning that I sometimes fail to be accountable to those who depend on me or need me the most.
However, if your group does not identify with you, it is difficult to get them to follow you. Yes, a good leader would have the skills to see that she might have to communicate with people differently to get them involved in the process. That could be done by offering to hear his/her opinion on the subject. Getting he’s or hers prospective can be a way of letting the person know that you value his or her input. This person will see that you have valued his or her opinion, and if you do not use his concepts or at least incorporate some of their ideas’ then you must tell then why you don’t think their concepts would be appropriate.
Sometimes an employee may not fully understand a particular task and what is expected of them. Constructive criticism can be the perfect form of communication for explaining the details about what the employee was doing wrong. It can also be used to explain the necessary steps needed to get them going in the right direction. An important part of explaining criticism to someone is not to pick out personality flaws. The action that needs to be corrected or behavior that is being displayed is the issue.
Finally, collective rationalization occurs when a group discounts critical information in order to support their current decision. Groupthink continues to plague groups today, yet vigilance and understanding of the major symptoms will promote better strategic decision
In this magic bullet theory author describes that individuals are assigned for their roles and project would be successful. Furthermore author says properly built IT system help to users to working efficient and effectively but cant ensure that users will use it as intended. Then he says if project fails what happen? How to describe with magic bullet theory? Failure of the projects will waste time and cost.
By appealing to others self-interests you can also gain acceptance of your ideas. Meta talk can help you overcome communication blocks by recognizing others feeling and frustrations. To use meta talk you must actively listen and pay close attention to underlying emotions. It is also helpful to set limits. Defining parameters and limits helps to avoid conflict and ease tensions.
Effectiveness on the other hand, is getting things done. The end goal must be met and so different factors that may change in the future must be taken into consideration. Being effective encourages innovation and makes one more adaptable to the changing environment. The negative side to only focusing on being effective or producing the end goal is that you may be engaging in whatever means possible without thinking about the costs and other factors that may have undesirable effects in the long run. For example, the over-working of employees with minimal added benefits and pay would lead to unproductive, tired employees which would then lead to lesser output and unhappy employees.
The training needs to make us aware of potential problems in the process so they can be avoided. Awareness of the pitfalls will allow us to tailor the messages with the audience in mind when we encode the message, or choose which type of medium to use to transmit the message with the most effectiveness and understanding. Any individual attribute that diminishes understanding is a personal barrier to effective communication. Some examples are variations in the sender’s and the receiver’s language skills, background and culture. Stereotypes and prejudices can alter perceptions and
A company knows they are special, but the potential customers won't know unless the company tells them. And they won't care unless they can see how that company with its products makes their lives easier. It's more than just showing the features of the products; one has got to explain the benefits - exactly how that product or service will relieve an operational headache, fulfill a yearning, or in some other fashion satisfy a need that the prospect has. It's best to slice out specific benefits that will distinguish the company’s products or services in the market. And to do that the company needs to position itself in the prospect’s mind.