How to identify a psychopath person? The Hare Psychopathy Checklist created by Robert Hare was initially developed to diagnose people who may exhibit the traits and tendencies, and mental condition of a psychopath. Most mental health professionals define a psychopath as a predator who takes advantage of others using charm, deceit, violence and other methods to get what they want. 1. Look for glib and superficial charm.
The sociopath and psychopath are truly unique characters. Many forensic psychologists, psychiatrists and criminologists use the terms sociopathy and psychopathy interchangeably. Leading experts disagree on whether there are meaningful differences between the two conditions. These individuals normally don’t know that they are sociopathic/psychopathic, and this makes them even more intriguing. Psychopathy and sociopaths are anti-social personality disorders.
Social learning theorists are very determined to find out if entertainment media are an influence of violence. Feelings and thoughts are what distinguishes one person from another. Some look at criminal behavior as a result of a disturbed personality structure. People who suffer from an anti social personality are often called “Antisocial”, “Psychopath”, and “Sociopath”. Defining characteristics include impulsivity, irresponsibility, risk taking, detachment issues and anti social behavior.
Or, are certain people born to do evil? Those are the questions I will answer in my opinion. Or at least try my best to do so. Are humans, by nature, evil? In my opinion some what they are.
They are failure to achieve positively valued goals, removal of positively valued stimuli, and confrontation with negative stimuli (Agnew, 1992). The major assumptions of General Strain Theory place emphasis on these types of strains and stressors and how they cause deviant behavior. The connection between the strains and deviant behavior are the negative emotions that are produced by the strains such as anger and anxiety. The causes of deviant behavior can be linked to those emotions and the personal resources available to handle the emotions. This helps to define why some individuals with similar strains commit crimes and why others chose legal manners in which they deal with their strains and emotions.
Factor 4 has to do with the early appearance of chronic antisocial behaviour. The following fall under this category: previous diagnosis as a psychopath or similar disorder, early behavioural problems, juvenile delinquency, and short-tempered/poor behavioural control. The last factor reflects impulsive and inadequately motivated criminal acts. Acts such as poor probation or parole risk, many types of offences, and pathological lying and deception are grouped in Factor This particular group of predators presents numerous challenges to morality, safety and policy. For instance, because a "psychopath" may display a general coldness toward others, they are more likely to commit criminal acts, and afterward not respond to punishment or deterrent tactics.
Psychopathy: Diagnosis, Theory, and Treatment Jama R. Young College of Saint Mary Psychopathy: Diagnosis, Theory, and Treatment What is a Psychopath? Psychopathy is a disorder, which is defined and “characterized in part by a diminished capacity for remorse and poor behavioral controls” (Blair, 2003, p. 5). Defining psychopathy gives shape to meaning behind the mental illness, but what does this mean? Those with the disorder are “ruthless social predators” (Cavadino, 1998, p .5). Persistently irresponsible, they are impulsive violators of what are considered social norms.
Mill later struggled with the concepts of utilitarianism because it was too unemotional and failed to capture or understand the ‘higher’ pleasure of happiness without pain. Bentham’s theory failed to acknowledge the complexities like emotion. However, Mill did not reject Bentham’s ideas of pleasure fulfillment; he created a more complex version of utilitarianism, yet one that still embraces the most basic premises of Bentham and of his father, James Mill. Mill defines utilitarianism as a theory based on the principle that "actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness." Mill defines happiness as pleasure and the absence of pain.
History of Antisocial Personality Disorder In the past people with an antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) have been termed psychopaths, sociopaths, and dissocial personalities. The term psychopath referred originally personality disorder in general; it was replaced with the term sociopath to include the social rather than only the psychological origins of the disorder. The criteria described by Cleckley (1941) included a person having superficial charm, unreliable, poor judgment, and lack of remorse. The term antisocial personality became the preferred term to use in the DSM-II, and then later the DSM-III added additional diagnostic criteria that put a much greater emphasis on criminal activities and behavior performed by a person with
Psychopathy is commonly characterised by a set of interpersonal (i.e., egocentricity, lovelessness, impersonal sexuality, superficial charm); emotional characteristics (i.e., poverty of affect, lack of nervousness, guiltlessness); and in addition to disinhibited or antisocial behaviour (i.e., unreliability, insufficient motivation for the costs associated with the behaviour), (Fowles & Dindo, 2010). Psychopaths are thought to inflict great suffering on their targets of their exploitation and also cause great cost to society as a whole. Psychopathy may be understood as a cluster of personality traits that includes remorselessness, callousness, deceitfulness, egocentricity, and failure to form close emotional bonds, low anxiety proneness, superficial charm, and externalization of blame, (Skeem, Monahan, & Mulvey, 2002). Another interesting description of a psychopath made by Hervey Cleckley in 1982 is the “mask of sanity” in which good functioning of the mask is underlined by disturbances. The reason for this paragraph and its extensive list of definitions and descriptions of psychopaths is due to the fact that psychopathy has not yet been agreed upon in the literature, in regards to a definitive