I am not saying that the bill will not work or that it is not needed, I just believe that more effort and thought should have gone into the proposed plan and what implications it has on all involved before trying to go live with coverage. I guess like everything else, time will tell the overall effectiveness and benefit of Obama Care and will show if it has made us better and more compassionate for those who are less fortunate or has had the opposite effect and has done more damage than good to an already unstable health care industry. References Bailey, L. (2008). Obama and McCain on Health Care Reform. Business & Economic Review, 55(1), 24-29.
There is no proven link between more spending and better care. (Grunweld, 2009) How doctors would cut health care costs, they would make sure the benefits are substantial once the new law takes full effect in 2014. People with preexisting medical conditions could no longer be denied insurance. (Alderman, 2010) All lifetime and annual limits on coverage would be eliminated and new policies would be required to meet higher benefit standards. How can the country reduce health care costs while not compromising quality?
What were the problems in the health care system that the Affordable Care Act of 2009 sought to address? What was the public option, and why did it not pass? How would the new health care program be paid for? What were some of the provisions of the Affordable Care Act? Some of the things that the Affordable Care Act of 2009 wanted to address were to make it possible for every American citizen to have insurance coverage; another problem they wanted the act to address was the help reduce the soaring cost of Medicaid.
Obama Care a for sure No!! The Obama Care act defined as a good way of providing affordable health insurance for the entire nation. How is the nation going to benefit from this act? I personally believe that the Obama Care act is beneficiating doctors and insurance providers by rewarding them, and it also may conclude to depriving people form the doctors or insurance that they have chosen. The Obama Care act is an act to beneficiate doctors and insurance companies by rewarding them.
Also establishes a transition to the Exchanges for eligible individuals.” (Healthcare.gov) This ban not only made it impossible for insurance companies to deny people under these circumstances, but also made it so the insurance companies cannot charge someone a higher rate because of a pre-existing condition, even in an emergency. This alone will make the lives the American people with health issues better. Making healthcare more available is not just about being able to accept sick people. It’s about making medical care more available. Obama Care does this by making it easier for everyone to be able to qualify for health insurance, making new taxes and spending cuts, while increasing funding for health education.
HEALTH is an acronym for: help efficient, accessible, low-cost, timely health care. It aims to “improve patient access to health care services and provide improved medical care by reducing the excessive burden the liability system places on the health care delivery system.” The bill also imposes caps on some damages awarded in malpractice lawsuits, limits attorneys’ fees, and establishes a statute of limitations for filing health care lawsuits. The committees involved with this bill are the House Judiciary, and the House Energy and
November 23, 2013 American National Government “ObamaCare” On March 23, 2010, President Barack Obama signed off on the healthcare act known as the Affordable Care Act that we also call “ObamaCare”. This is the national health care plan aimed at reforming the American health care system. This was thought of to provide more affordable health insurance. ObamaCare was put together with thoughts of lowering the uninsured rate by expanding public and private insurance coverage, and reducing the costs of healthcare for individuals. With ObamaCare, many are reaping the benefits, but not everyone is happy about the impact of this act.
(Department of Health (DOH), 2010). These changes are to occur in a period of financial constraint, with the aim of reducing bureaucracy and empowering front line clinicians. (DOH, 2010). The proposal to use EMTs and A&E support ignores current inefficiencies in the way patients are treated. EMTs, trained in basic and advanced life support, deal with a range of life threatening illnesses and injuries and can administer a range of drugs.
So the government should set aside some finances for the implementation of this bill wisely and carefully by making sure that it does not drive up the taxes as the prices of goods are already high as it is. For the insurance agencies, they should include an all out and fair insurance cover which will not prejudice against the low income earners. As suggested by Blendon, R.J and Benson JM (April 2010). In their article, "Public opinion at the time of the vote on health care reform". His advice to the government and the Medicare experts are simple, they suggested that the government should look into the bill again and revise it allowing for purchases of drugs from Canada and ensuring a limitation of the malpractices and for the government to reduce the qualifying age for Medicare.
For example, managed care providers emphasize on keeping enrollees healthy to reduce use of services and financial incentives for enrollees to use providers and procedures associated with the plan. All these can compromise the quality of healthcare provided to members. On the micro-level, managed care has changed healthcare delivery by enforcing measures aimed at reducing cost. For example, pay for performance (P4P) is a toll used in the U.S. to improve efficiency in healthcare systems by rewarding health care providers for following certain procedures. Such systems could compromise the quality of