Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Electoral College

838 Words4 Pages
The Electoral College is not a place, but a process to decide who will be the next president of the United States. The Electoral College consists of senators and representative of each political party who cast their votes for the state they represent. Each state allocated a certain number of electors equal to the number of senators and representatives. This number is also based on the states’ population. The founding fathers devised this system with checks and balances in order to keep the political power in balance and to deter any power abuse from all parties and individual. Back in 1789, the country was split up into thirteen states. Although these thirteen states were unified under on nation, there was a lack of transportation between them which in turn also meant a lack of communication. The founding fathers…show more content…
It is understandable that the founding fathers did want neither the Congress nor the people to have the power in electing the president. They were afraid that the people were too emotionally driven and susceptible to mob mentality and if Congress chose, then the president would commit their job to Congress; and this would corrupt separation of power. Electoral College ensures that the most qualified person, not necessarily the most popular, would be selected by groups of electors, representing their states but also expressing their personal convictions. If we were to abolish the Electoral College, it would mean Amend the Constitution. With two-thirds of both houses are needed to pass a constitutional amendment, and in the states, also three-fourth of which are needed to ratify an amendment. I am not sure if it would help us or hurt us to abolish the Electoral College system, since it helped us already for hundreds of years to get where we are now. And why mess with tradition? Bottom line we should keep the Electoral
Open Document