Persuasive Article Analysis

736 Words3 Pages
Persuasive Article Analysis Should smoking cigarettes in a public place be banned? In the article “Banning Smoking in Public Places: A Necessary Evil?” by Dr. Mark Clayson, it is shown why he believes that smoking in public places is erroneous and needs to be ceased. The persuasive techniques used by Dr. Clayson are vital for changing a narrow minded reader. He uses facts and a few red herrings to really bring the audience to his side. Talking about the health risks of smoking, how work places would become greater, and how banning smoking will help smokers quit, Mark Clayson declares his point of view and brings an open concept for the future. To begin, Dr. Clayson describes how the health of non-smokers is at risk when there is smoking moving in and out of their lungs. He states how it is unfair that someone who chooses not to smoke can still be in danger of a smoking related illness, and many non-smokers can relate to feeling uncomfortable and endangered around a smoky room. He states, for adults, cancer, lung disease, and asthma are the three most common illnesses. Additionally, asthma and middle ear infection are the most common harms done to children when exposed to second hand smoke. By stating these harsh facts to support his idea, Clayson pulls the reader in. After seeing that children may be at risk a reader will often begin to think; maybe this is a necessary evil. Moving on, Dr. Mark Clayson provides his reasoning for non-smoking workplaces being superior to smoking workplaces. To persuade, he writes about cigarette related illnesses leading to absenteeism in businesses. Clayson feels that healthier employees lead to a more successful business. Today in America being healthy is a great way to display power and succeed in a work environment. Also, he adds that a smoker should understand the danger of harming his or her coworkers and be willing to post

More about Persuasive Article Analysis

Open Document