Personal Philosophy of Counseling

2534 Words11 Pages
Personal Philosophy of Counseling Nathan D. Smith East Central University HURES 5613 Counseling Theories, Summer 2013 Steven Roring, Ph.D. July 26, 2013 I recognize that my personal philosophy of counseling is in a state of change as I continue to mentally integrate what I perceive to be the best attributes of the counseling theories that have been presented during this course. Prior to taking this course, I identified myself as a counselor who primarily utilized Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (CBT). Currently, I would describe myself as moving toward the integrative perspective. I do not pretend to assume that I have developed a true integrative perspective yet as I do not possess the required knowledge and competencies that would allow me to use this approach. However, I see myself moving in the direction of the assimilative integration approach in particular. That is, remaining grounded in CBT but open to incorporate the methods of other theories that are best suited to the needs of the client. Why the integrative approach? I think the appropriate response after reading the textbook for this class would be why would anyone not use this approach? It is fallacy to think that there is only one truth when dealing with clients. The author of this textbook, Gerald Corey, agrees with this summation when he states “…no one theory contains all the truth, and...no single set of counseling techniques is always effective with working with diverse client populations…” (Corey, 2013, pg. 468) The textbook further warns that trying to apply one counseling method to every client could raise ethical concerns. How does one then decide from amongst all the various theories? Corey recommends that one should “remain open and selectively incorporate a framework for counseling that is consistent with your own personality and your belief system.” (Corey, 2013, pg. 471)

More about Personal Philosophy of Counseling

Open Document