Mexican War American Imperialism Analysis

727 Words3 Pages
Was the Mexican War an Exercise in American Imperialism? Throughout history, presidents have represented United States by making choices that would affect the nation. Every choice they make can be put under the microscope, examined and scrutinized until there is nothing left. Historians, Walter Nugent and Norman A. Graebner discuss their point of views and argue on whether or not James K. Polk’s presidency and actions turned the Mexican War into a moment of American Imperialism. Nugent argues that Polk was an ignorant man who used his power to bully Mexico when they were unstable. Graebner’s opinion is that James Polk used an aggressive approach that he thought would persuade Mexico to sell land to the states. Walter Nugent argues that the Mexican War is an exercise of American Imperialism because James K. Polk used his power as president to influence and force issues upon the nation. He describes him as a “hedgehog” of his time. Nugent compares James Polk to Presidents George W. Bush and Andrew Jackson as to say that Polk is a “hedgehog”. Nugent uses Isaiah Berlin’s definition by…show more content…
Graebner argues saying that the Mexican War was not an exercise of American Imperialism. Graebner says that the reason for the war was that the states were fighting to defend the country and payment for debts that Mexico owed the US. In Graebner’s article he discussed examples of quotes. One of them said that Mexico started the war. It said that they were first to step onto American soil and began fighting. They insulted the US and they could no longer take it. He feels that like Polk didn’t want to go to war, but thought it was the patriotic response to Mexico actions. He felt that it could have been avoided, but after all they were refusing to pay the debts owed to us and to take the compensation of money he offered for that area of land. And to top it all off they entered American soil. It wasn’t a rash decision it was a just and patriotic
Open Document