Macbeth Is A Man More Sinned Against Than Sinning Macbeth throughout the whole play commits many sins but the question is whether his sins are justified from the sins that have been committed against him. Did others really do the same amount of sins to Macbeth as he did to others. I believe not. For example Macduffs whole family was killed because of Macbeth. Was there a good reason behind this no all Macduff had done was flee from Macbeths control who was not the righteous king anyhow.
Macbeth Kalinda Scheef Guilt Guilt fuels William Shakespeare’s play Macbeth, as an underlying theme though the later part of the play. This is most prominent in two main characters, Macbeth and Lady Macbeth. Macbeth is an ambitious man with an implacably determined wife. Lady Macbeth wishes for nothing more than her husband to be King. The characters determination for power causes them to carry out immoral acts.
As the play goes on Macbeth becomes greedy after the mysterious visit of the three witches telling him he will become king. Macbeth becomes the bad guy in this situation when bad thoughts of murder came to mind and started to overcome the good in him. Murder was his intention and for that he killed fellow men who once where in close relation to him and his wife. “I have done the deed.” (Macbeth 2.2) The reason for Macbeth to even believe in himself that he could get away with this is because he was so trustworthy in the beginning by being the good guy and helping out the townspeople rather than being the one to make them need help. Good may be evil hidden so well that there would be no determination if they were actually really good.
This small act awakened the greed that Macbeth had always possessed but never acknowledged. Macbeth afterwards felt he deserved to be crowded king and would stop at nothing to fulfil this dream. This is the first sign that Macbeth’s character is losing control of reality. Furthermore, after honourably receiving the title of Thane of Cawdor, Macbeth, being a greedy character, was not satisfied. With the success of the first prophecy, Macbeth recall’s the second prophecy that he “shalt be king hereafter!” (I, iii, 54).
He wanted to rule his country, a perfectly sane and moral goal. His intentions went sour throughout his journey, however, when he came to the conclusion that in order to control the kingdom, he must kill Duncan, then Banquo along with Fleance, and finally the Macduff family. One would think, if reading just the facts of these murderous plans, that Macbeth is pure of evil intentions and destructive measures. However,
They both have various similarities and differences and these comparisons say a great deal about both of their characters. Now, a key difference between Banquo and Macbeth is that Macbeth is already obviously a representation of the Machiavellian concept. He is willing to do whatever it takes to get what he wants, in this case, the prestigious title, King. As soon as the three witches give him his prophecy, he is engulfed with the hunger, the desire of power. Due to this unrestrained burst of ambition, Macbeth turns to darkness and he begins to act on his thoughts even though when Banquo asks if he ever thinks about the witches’ prophecy, he denies it all.
Before hearing the witch’s prophecy, he was a virtuous and ethical person, but after hearing that he is destined for kingship, he goes on a murderous rampage to gain political power, completely disregarding his previous decency. This is similar to how Oedipus was originally a just ruler, until he hears that he is the reason for the plague upon Thebes, which he is unable to believe because he is blinded by pride and arrogance similar to how Macbeth is blinded by the quest for supremacy. At this point in the play, blood, as well as Macbeth, has made the complete transformation from symbolizing virtue, courage, and integrity, and instead represents guilt, murder, and
Macbeth can be seen as a tragic figure, but he shouldn’t t be treated as a complete tragic figure. Although Macbeth does have our sympathy, he also has our bitterness. He killed King Duncan, Banquo and Macduff s family not only because of the circumstances, but also for the sake of his greed for honour and nobility. His greed caused his own country to be filled with fear, grief and unhappiness, which is personified in one of Malcolm s speeches that makes us feel the pain Scotland, is feeling: Malcolm: I think our country sinks beneath the yoke; It weeps, it bleeds, and each new day a gash Is added to her wounds. We feel sad for Macbeth s death, but we also feel happy that he was executed.
“Thou hast it now—King, Cawdor, Glamis, all / As the Wëird Women promised, and I fear / Thou played’st most foully for ‘t. Yet it was said / It should not stand in thy posterity, / But that myself should be the root and father / Of many kings.” (81) Though he knew that something was up, he chose to ignore this instinct for his own personal gain, because, as it was promised, he should bear many Kings of the future. This proved an unwise choice, as the deceitful Macbeth had him murdered by hired hit men to make sure him or his offspring would not attempt to kill him. “O treachery! Fly, good Fleance, fly, fly, fly!
It's like their desire and goal is to push Macbeth into committing evil acts. They do this by convincing him that they can predict fate and future and that their prophecies are true. Macbeth was also very interested in hearing those prophecies himself. What the witches predicted became true, and that is why Macbeth started believing them. (“Two truths are told,/As happy prologues to the swelling act/Of the imperial theme.” I, iii, 26-29).