Landon Todd September 4, 2007 Intermediate Writing 2010 Analyzing the Rhetorical Situation essay Rhetorical Effectiveness of Kim Jeffery Kim Jeffery’s article, “The bottled water industry is getting a bad rap“, is taking the position of bottled water distribution being very beneficial in many ways. Bans on bottled water in areas have been proposed, and Kim Jeffery explains with facts and statistics in his article why bottled water is not a problem. He gives reasons for the important uses of bottled water, and defends his own company’s production of bottled water. The context of issues for this article seem to be a range of environmental issues that have been going on for some time now. These days people have been very caught up in how societies disposal of fuels and waste products have effected the environment.
The “but for” test for causation is used. Ex: If PG&E had put a sheet underneath the ponds, the injuries to the community would not have happened. Proximate Cause: Plaintiff must establish that the harm suffered by the injured person was a foreseeable consequence of the defendant’s negligent actions. Ex: PG&E dumps excess water into ponds which should have sheet underneath so no toxic water gets out * Foreseeability * Unbroken chain from actual cause to injury * Zone of danger 3) Injury: 14 years of hex chrome seeping into dirt over to contaminate water the families of Hinkley drink and use caused significant injuries such as cancers, miscarriages and kidney stones. II.
The court, therefore, will dismiss the case when the doctrine is applied since the defendant will argue their case based on the persuasiveness of the lower court or private court’s rulings. 1-7.The dormant Commerce Clause Purto Rico enacted a law in 2001 that sought for specific labels on cements sold in the state with a penalty on any company that violated the requirements. Similarly, the enacted law prohibited the sale of cements from outside the state. Antilles cement firm that imports from outside the stated filed a case in the court with claims that the enacted law violated the dormant commerce
PG&E dumped so many gallons of chemical waste into the water that the hexavalent chromium 6 levels were 10 times the legal limit in the water. Negligence is clear in the Anderson case but with Scotchwood it is a little different. Rick Jones, father of deceased Sam Jones, is suing Scotchwood for strict liability due to negligence. Scotchwood feels they were not negligent because they put in the newspaper, put on TV, and sent out mail warning citizens of the Pindia in the water. They tested the water, did not try and hide any information from the people, and even replaced the most deteriorating pipes.
Lab 2 Report: Water Quality and Contamination Kristy Vasquez SCI 207: Dependence of man on the environment S. Tuckerman 01/12/2015 Clean Water Experiments The background of water quality and related issues can go back as far as the Clean Water Act. The objective of the Clean Water Act is to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of America’s waters and their systems. Under Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act, states, territories, and authorized tribes, referred to as an act of the state, are to publish lists of impaired waters. These waters therefore are technology based rules and are not harsh enough to meet the water quality standards set by the states. (http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/lawsguidance/cwa/tmdl/glossary.cfm#section303d) Water quality research is very important to our society.
It did so as the river was so heavily polluted from an oil spill a few months back. As this happened, all the pollution was heading downstream towards Lake Erie. This was an alarming wakeup call that made people realize how bad the condition of the lakes were. Pollution in the lakes has always been a concern to people since the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. That law was in place to prevent any litter or debris that could cause problematic issues to shipping lanes.
138). The oil sands mining operations have had an increasingly devastating effect on the natural landscape surrounding the Athabasca river, Fort McMurray and Fort Chipewyan. One notable human impact is the increased potential for developing cancers. Aboriginal leaders have identified communities with an increase in deaths due to illnesses and cancers “associated with petroleum waste and by-products” (Wong, 2013, p. 134). According to a study done by Tenenbaum (2009, p. 153) there is an increase in the number of blood and lymphatic, biliary tract, and soft tissue cancers.
The methane concentration is seventeen percent higher in the drinking water near sites where fracking is performed. The water is used by near by cities and towns. This water has been seen to cause sensory, respiratory, and neurological damage to those who are exposed to it. The chemicals used in the mixture are chemicals known to cause cancer. Fracking is also hard on the environment.
For many decades, water pollution has been a major environmental issue. "Water pollution is the contamination of water bodies and occurs when pollutants are discharged directly or indirectly into water bodies without adequate treatment to remove harmful compounds" (Wales). Lake Huron, which is known as the third largest of the lakes by volume of Great Lakes, (Lakes Huron) water quality has been of major concern. Few major sources identified were faulty septic systems and agriculture. Some of the effects caused by the pollution included: disruption of aquatic life, elevated levels of nitrates and phosphates from polluted underground water, swimming prevention, and numerous outbreaks of Avian Botulism.
“The oil and gas provision gives the state the power to "regulate the development, production and utilization of natural resources of oil and gas. " The town proclaims that it was not trying to regulate fracking but just trying to protect its citizens and property. The town is following provisions that address groundwater contamination such as the Safe Drinking Water Act, Resource Conservation Act, and the Superfund Act. The government introduced legislation to both houses of the 11th United States Congress in 2009 called the Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals Act. It aims to define fracking as a federally regulated activity under the SDWA.