Live Music V. Recorded Music

737 Words3 Pages
“Live Music vs. Recorded Music” Since the beginning of time, people have enjoyed listening and playing various types of music. Around the world, whether playing tribal drums in Africa, or simply turning on the radio, music is a way to express emotion. The argument, especially in the last few decades, has been whether it’s better to go see a group preform live, or to go buy their latest album. Regardless of one’s opinion on the matter, everyone can agree that both options have their pros and cons. Essentially, music has been around since the beginning of time, and has played a very important part in the evolution of men. From Neanderthals banging sticks together, to The Beatles driving teenage girl’s crazy with their love songs, some form of music has always been around. However, it wasn’t until around the turn of the 20th century that we had the idea to record music. When this happened, people started buying records and sharing them with their friends. This gave many people an exposure to a copious amount of music that they have never heard before. For centuries, musicians have been playing their pieces for the public to enjoy, but in the last hundred years or so it has changed dramatically. Groups and ensembles touring across the country to perform for hundreds upon thousands of people. You wouldn’t have seen Beethoven or Chopin go on a 30 city 5 country tour. With recorded music, it almost sounds perfect. After auto tune and various editing softwares, it is very hard to hear a mistake. Some call it cheating, but others say that listening to a recording is like listening to what the artist intended the piece to sound like prior to writing it. Although, back when we first started recording, we didn’t have all the technology we do today. It was more of an authentic sound; one could notice this by listening to a song on a phonograph, then
Open Document