Some times families do not have the best circumstances in living, such as being in rough areas, not having stable jobs, and struggling to afford food and other needs. Another reason kids join gangs, is because they see the “cash flow” that comes along with selling the drugs and holding up gas stations and other stores. According to nationalconcernedofficers.com, when they speak about money, they say: “Many youth join
Instead of arresting people for simple things as weed possessions why are they not arresting this people that are committing murders? Even when the NOPD do arrest some of these criminals most get off or get little time with parole. Should this be acceptable? No it shouldn’t that why New Orleans is one of the top cities for murders. This needs to get put into control.
Somewhere in the 19th century, there was an incredible rise of immigration rates. Immigrants were coming to America in big numbers, and they needed jobs and housing. The overflow of immigrants caused a new problem for them, for many of them were jobless and had poor housing. In the middle of the 19th century, immigrants were coming to America left and right. It quickly became a predicament where there were more people than places to live in.
Instead, the judge hears all evidence for the case and then rules whether or not the juvenile is a delinquent. This process is known as an adjudication hearing. Adults will also be sentenced more harshly than juveniles because of the purpose
There are certain crimes for which, no matter the age the criminal should be punished by having to face serious charges. In today’s society many young children and teens under the age of 18 pursue the life of committing crimes. When young offenders commit a certain crime, which in most cases it is murder or rape they face the regular justice system where they will be tried as an adult. Being tried as an adult lets the juveniles face state penitentiaries and sentences up to life without any parole. Criminals need to be punished to the extent if it’s a serious crime.
Every year hundreds of people are murdered while the criminal who did this horrible crime continues to live their life until they are put behind bars. When these murderers go to trial, they are either put in prison for live or they receive the death penalty. There are many people who believe that the death penalty is a violation of a person’s constitutional rights, but didn’t the person who committed the crime violate their victim’s constitutional rights? I believe in capital punishment and I believe that if you commit the crime you should be held responsible for your actions. The death penalty is a deterrent to crime and it ensures that the criminal will never have the chance to harm anyone ever again.
If there is not enough evidence then the grand jury will issue a “No True Bill”. At his point, the prosecutor may request another grand jury, but it is not common practice. Some places do not use grand jury proceedings anymore so they have a preliminary hearing (Hill & Hill, 2012). A preliminary hearing is a hearing to determine if a person charged with a felony (a serious crime punishable by a term in the state prison) should be tried for the crime charged, based on whether there is some substantial evidence that he or she committed the crime (Hill & Hill, 2012). A preliminary hearing is held in front of a judge where the prosecution presents only enough evidence to show probability of guilt.
Does Waiving Juveniles to Criminal Court Deter Recidivism November 28, 2012 Does waiving juveniles to criminal court deter recidivism? Violent youth crime has contributed to the perception that something is seriously wrong with our society and legislative system; crime is no longer a man’s game, it’s becoming child’s play. The continued rise in youth crime over the past decades has increased the public’s fear of juvenile offenders. Those who have been victimized call upon our legislators for stronger measures to deal with juveniles who continue to commit crime. Today, all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia allow juveniles to be prosecuted in criminal court.
If a twelve-year-old child murdered a person, what should be his/her punishment? If a thirty-year-old adult murdered a person, what should be his/her punishment? Should there be a difference in punishment? In recent years there has been a remarkable shift in the way juvenile crime is viewed by policymakers and the general public, one that has led to widespread changes in policies and practices concerning the treatment of juvenile offenders. Rather than choosing to define offenses committed by youth as delinquents, society increasingly is opting to redefine them as adults and transfer them to the adult court and criminal justice system.