The first poin of view to this question answer is simply yes. Teenagers who commit dangerous crimes should be punished as adults to protect society from dangerous individuals regardless of age. It sends a clear message to juveniles who commit murder, rape, and assault that they must be accountable for their actions. Many think that teens have the maturity and judgement necessary to make
It is defiantly a fact that juvenile justice system has changed dramatically over the last one hundred plus years. The change has affected juveniles over the course of the years in a positive way which is fair compared to some of the cruel punishments that juvenile’s years back received when they were trialed as adults. One hundred years ago there was no such thing as the Juvenile Justice Court where juveniles of all ages nowadays would be hoped to correct their wrongs to right. Laws back then against young criminals were so intense that a 8 year old who might of played a part of stealing at a local deli would be thrown in jail with adult prisoners, would have been beaten for his actions, and would have been embarrassed for his actions as well. Laws and punishments have indeed done a 180 degree spin on what the federal government original message towards juvenile delinquency was.
I think in some ways its and advantage because it will help place habitual or serious offenders out of the community and into some other placement to get treatment. i think it can become a problem or have disadvantages like when it discussed how juveniles were executed and put to the death penalty for their crimes and I'd have to agree with it being against the 8th amendment on unuasl and cruel
3.) What does projecting our youths population do for our justice system? In the year 1995 is when people began too project the next centuries juvenile crime rates. James Wilson figured that the nation at the end of the decade in the 1990's that there would be roughly one million more teenagers in the delinquent ages of fourteen to seventeen than there was in 1995. This raised his eyebrows and he started too put together numbers to figure up the effect of what this many more teenagers would have on the society.
They are a few exceptions to this rule, as to when a minor or juvenile maybe charged as an adult. The major difference between juvenile and adult court, is adult court is designed to see if the offender has any criminal responsibility to the crime. Also in adult court, they are tried by a party of their peers and punishment is set forth. Can one really see a minor being tried by their peers? This is the reason why the judge has the major say in juvenile court and proceedings.
Minors and Crime Serving adult time Angela Thomas Strayer University Minors and crimes Accountability is the word that needs to be used when it comes to minors who commit crimes. There are countless crimes being committed by minors of today. Crimes like burglary, robbery, rape, assault and murders just to name a few. These minors will grow to be the adults of tomorrow, so there has to be a better solution to this problem that society is facing when it comes to minors who commit crimes. What is a suitable sentence for these minors?
General Strain Theory “Strain theories state that certain strains or stressors increase the likelihood of crime. These strains lead to negative emotions, such as frustration and anger.” (Agnew& Scheverman, 2010) This theory really focuses on who someone deals with certain stressors happening in their life. If someone is angry will they handle the situation in a calm/ prosocial way or a violent/criminal way? I find this theory interesting because stress plays a role in everyone’s daily life, and I am a strong believer in there being a reason for everyone’s actions. I think that a lot of criminals engage in criminal behavior because they are dealing with some pretty intense stuff and they use crime as a way to handle the situation they are in.
The law does recognize these differences, but, a Juvenile, like an adult, makes the choice to commit a crime or not. Therefore, like an adult, they must be held accountable. A Juvenile Delinquent is defined as an individual under the age of 18 who commit acts which would be unlawful if committed by an adult. More juveniles are growing up now without cooperating peacefully with the law than ever before. Many of them often pay a low price even when caught.
Does the death penalty serve as a justified and legitimate form of punishment? This issue has recurrently created controversial debates. Whenever the word "death penalty" comes up, extremists from both sides start yelling out their arguments. One side says discriminative, the other side says fair; one says execution; the other side says justice. Crime is an inevitable part of society, and everyone is aware that something must be done about it.
Should juveniles who have been physically, mentally, and sexually abused be handed adult sentences for retaliating? We need to look at exactly what influences children to commit heinous crimes. Mentally ill patients should be cared for as mentally ill patients, not criminal offenders. The mentally ill need an alternative to the prison system. Justice has evolved a great deal, especially when the death penalty is involved.