It should not be the school’s responsibility to teach values and morals but, to support and uphold these basic beliefs. Parents should be aware and educating their students about what is proper and improper to bring to school. Schools with routine locker searches, where students are being caught help reinforce positive behavior within the student body. This fosters a positive atmosphere for everyone. I would like to believe that schools provide safe environments for our children to learn and grow.
Later that day police found both respondents at Greenwood's in which large quantities of cocaine and hashish. The police arrested both victims for felony of drugs and were placed on posted bail. This process was repeated again on May 4th by another investigator named Robert Rahaeuser who also found more evidence of narcotic use in garbage bags. Facts of case's verdict Greenwood
Criminal Law 2/3/2011 State v. Fox (1985) Supreme Court of Utah FACTS:* 1. Gary (D) and Clive Fox (D) were charged with possession and intent to distribute and production of a controlled substance in violation of U.C.A 153 § 58-37-8(1). 2. D. found guilty as charged by District Court. 3.On appeal, the defendants renew their claim that there was insufficient evidence to prove that they grew marijuana and that the marijuana found in the residence belonged to them or was for distribution.
DLK vs. the United States In order to override privacy concerns without a warrant, law enforcement must be in danger of losing evidence. In the case of DLK vs. the United States, federal agents suspected DLK of growing marijuana plants in his home. Since they had no physical evidence, officers used a thermal scanner to detect any unusual heat patters coming from the home. After scanning and finding a few of those patterns, a judge issued a warrant that resulted in the finding of over 100 marijuana plants. In this case, I believe the government took it too far because there was no warrant allowing officers to scan DLK’s home, there was no danger of losing evidence, and DLK’s fourth amendment rights were violated.
For instance a trash can was place on the street for trash pick-up and a police walking the beat and he notice that noise was coming from the can and decided to investigate and found live puppies in the trash can along with some mail with the address on it. The police had probable cause to search the trash can and a warrant wasn’t needed to do. Curtilage is protected under the Fourth Amendment and must follow specific guidelines, which means authorities must have a search warrant. For instances the police remove items from Mr. Peabody porch without a warrant. They proceeded to arrest Mr. Peabody, the judge dismisses the case because the police did not follow the Fourth amendment to get a warrant before they search and seize the owner property.
If you have nothing to hide, and you’re not planning anything illegal, none of the new security measures should matter. The patriot act states that officials can now look at emails, phone calls, text messages, etc, so my opponent may say that this is a violation to personal freedom, but when you think about it, it really doesn’t matter. Who cares if a random official you will most likely never meet reads an email you sent to your parent? Even then, they wouldn’t even consider looking through any of those unless they felt they had a valid
Another article was in February 1999; Roy Lynn was attacked by a police dog. Weeaks had surrendered to police and was lying face down on the ground and then the police released the dog and ordered it to attack him. The dog bit him in the groin and nearly severed his penis. Given the small number of cases we could conclude that excessive force is rare in police-citizen contacts and is often accompanied by some possible provocative behavior. The use of excessive work on a civilian by a police is a criminal offense and should not be done.
Gun control has two sole purposes, to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and to help save lives. Guns and crimes do not need to go hand in hand. Having a gun does not necessarily lead to a crime. Any person or group who is for gun control admits that although guns are dangerous, if restrictions are placed on getting a gun, guns do not need to lead to a crime. Having a mandatory waiting period to buy a gun is a perfect example.
Current law states that us college students won’t loose our financial aid if we do something grotesque like rape or assault someone. Good news if you’re a rapist, but if you’re just the typical college student who gets caught with weed, then your screwed. Federal law states that since a drug offense is a federal offence and you loose all federal support. Ridiculous of course, but what do you expect this is America. I think that the issue has been ran around for far too long, marijuana must be de-criminalized.
There is a strict rule that needs to be followed concerning children being picked up from school and if parents cannot pick their children up, meaning someone else picking them up, the school needs to know to avoid any risks of child abduction. Children wait in the school entrance following after school activities, until the correct person arrive to collect the pupil. The duties of supervisory staff e.g. Teaching Assistants are to make themselves familiar with the H+S Act and any other safety issues relevant to their area of work. The School treats Health and Safety seriously, from the playground to the classrooms, the people in the setting are made aware of the risks and told that possible risks are also laminated and put on the walls as an extra reminder of any risks there may be.