a representation of some aspect of the natural world * What are some reasons that scientists use models? to gain an aspect of the natural world, different models about the same subject may result in different results that my support or refute a claim.. Scientists need to know the limitations of the models, so they don't have flawed observations * What are some examples of scientific models? globe, map, * Why might a scientist need to use several different models of the same aspect of the natural world? Why isn’t one model enough? Because no model represents all aspects of the natural world perfectly * Why is it important for a scientist to understand the limitations of the models they use?
Instead, there are several popular models competing for dominance, and the supporters of each model are having trouble understanding each other. ("Evolutionary Psychology ", 2009). Psychology is a discipline that asks and answers the fundamental question, why do we behave the way we do and think the way we think? The best way to characterize the different approaches that are taken to answer the question of psychology is to identify them as major perspectives. The major perspectives represent fundamental assumptions that underlie the research questions and methods that are used in order to answer the questions of psychology.
When intentionally deceiving any participant, you risk harming them because the integrity of the informed consent process is jeopardized. Participants have the right to full disclosure about the nature and purpose of the research, the procedures being used, and the expected benefits the research will provide.
* Questions of Procedure: What should be done about it? 5. How do classical stases apply in analyzing scientific discourse? * evidential: what exists or doesn’t exist in the natural world? * Interpretive: facts are settled, but argue on what theory applies and so on * Evaluative: the significance * Methodological: procedures and techniques + what will be the outcome 6.
4. Using the book as a guide, describe the process of scientific inquiry. Examine the often contradictory forces of altruism and profit as they influenced research related to HeLa. What are the risks and benefits of
ch1 Key 1. People sometimes have difficulty distinguishing between scientific explanations of common events and other kinds of explanation (superstition, prejudice, magic, etc.). Which of the following best helps to identify a scientific explanation? A. The explanation goes against the results of public opinion polls.
While on the surface these worldviews conflict, this paper argues that there is a role for both. The Scientific Method Distinguishing science from other ways of seeking knowledge requires focusing on the scientific method. Fundamentally, this method involves a “merger of rationalism and empiricism” as scientists collect data and test hypothesis using the data (Jackson, 2009). Generally speaking, the scientific method consists of six steps, the first of which is to identify an empirically solvable problem (Jackson, 2009). Second, conduct a literature review to gain better understanding of past research on the topic.
A scientifically accepted general principle supported by a substantial body of evidence offered to provide an explanation of observed facts and as a basis for future discussion or investigation (Lincoln et al.,1990). Again in simple terms, a theory explains how nature works. Can be modified. In conclusion, scientific laws and theories officially do not have the same meaning. I can understand how people can confuse these two words for having the same
Is the evidence “tinted” by the way the writer presents or discusses it (An article in a scientific journal might list raw numbers along with formulas, ideally providing objective information . Informal essays, cast in the writer’s voice, may intentionally or unintentionally suggest an attitude towards the information that sways the reader.) Clearly, some of these subjects may overlap. If you see connections between the questions, you are doing well. Focus, however, on responding to one prompt.
Evolution should be taught as a scientific hypothesis. The fact is that most of the time it is just not presented in the proper context, it is taught as a theory without the proper presentation of other “theories”. A little background information as to why the question continues to cause such a stir. In general when we refer to the term "theory" we often mean something that is unproven or an educated guess. Prior to being educated properly we say, "It's just a theory."