How Did the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny?

955 Words4 Pages
United States is a place of democracy, however; there are many possibilities that there would be a tyranny. In the summer of 1787, forty-five delegates that are representing twelve out of thirteen states went to Philadelphia to fix an issue. The issue was that the Articles of Confederation was just not working! Why? Because they left too much power with the states. The federal government had no power to levy or collect taxes, no power to regulate trade, and no power to enforce laws. There was also no executive branch under the Articles of Confederation, and no national court system. So the delegates had to create a national government that would actually work out and have no tyranny towards who has little power or strong power between a person or a group of people. So ask yourself, what did the constitution do to oppose cruelty? To define tyranny, it means cruel and oppressive government or rule. Another way to define tyranny is cruel, unreasonable, or arbitrary use of power or control. The Constitution guarded against tyranny in several ways which were: federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and lastly, small and large states. The first guard against tyranny was federalism which means that during the constitution meeting, the delegates decided to give certain powers to the Central Government and the States plus have powers shared between them. One example is that a way they both have an ability to tax, borrow money, make laws, etc. This example protects against tyranny because this is showing that they have equal powers when wanting to do something together that must be approved. Another example is that It portrays that the focal government can, "control exchange, conduct outside relations and proclaim war." Meanwhile, the states can, "set up neighborhood governments, hold races and build schools." As James Madison said, "The distinctive
Open Document