Higher Taxes and Junk Food

417 Words2 Pages
TOPIC: In order to encourage healthy eating higher taxes should be placed on junk food. NARROWED TOPIC: Higher taxes should be placed on junk food to promote healthy eating. PURPOSE: To convince the public that the eating of junk food can lead to health implications. THESIS: Higher taxes on junk food would discourage people from eating unhealthy, which contributes to obesity, depression and offers little or no nutritional value to individual. I. Implementing higher taxes on junk food will decrease healthcare costs associated with obesity. (Badilas, 2011) A. Obesity reduces life expectancy by more than 10 years. B. Obesity related illnesses have taken more lives than smoking and aids. C. Higher taxes will act as a deterrent, while raising revenue, which can be used to fund diversified farming and wellness programs. II. People who eat food filled with high fats amount are at a greater risk of facing depression. A. Hamburgers, pizzas and hotdogs heightens the chance of developing depression. B. 5% of junk food consumers are more likely to develop mood sings. III. Even though tasty, junk food is dangerously high in fats, sugar and salts (calories). (Parseghian, 2001) A. Sugar is considered a nutritional robber as it supplies only empty calories. B. Artificial agents have been found to increase allergies in children. C. Hydrogenated fats are the most common in junk foods. COUNTERCLAIM IV. If you tax junk food you are basically taxing the poor . A. Poor people tend to eat junk food more because that’s all they can afford. B. Government has no right to regulate a person’s food choices. C. Increased tax would slowly decrease consumption and that will have a negative effect on employment in fast food establishments. REBUTTAL V. Currently there are more than 1 billion people

More about Higher Taxes and Junk Food

Open Document