How many members did it include? What was its purpose? • Describe the behaviors the team or group exhibited as it went through each stage of development? • Describe a problem the team or group encountered. What steps were taken to address and solve the problem?
Stakeholder Influences on Programs Stakeholders are a person, group, or organization that has direct or indirect stake in an organization’s actions, objectives, and policies. Stake holding can be self-legitimizing; however, not all stakeholders are equal and are entitled to different considerations (BusinessDictionary.com, 2012). The power or impact of stakeholders depends upon the nature of the program, rights given to the stakeholder, and overall program objective. Stakeholders can be categorized under the three categories listed below: Primary Stakeholders –Beneficiaries or targets of the effort. Beneficiaries are those who stand to gain something as a direct result of the effort.
e) Almost every situation presented with relation to group dynamics and behavior can have multiple avenues for remedy. It is important to develop the ability to critically evaluate more than one alternative and rationally identify pros and cons of each. f) Presenting pros and cons for the identified alternative solutions in a table format within the paper is acceptable. Reflection Discuss whether Christine was an effective group leader in this case. Why or Why
Critical thinking tools have been created to help make the critical thinking process easier. Many people apply the critical thinking tools differently. The way the tools are applied, based on the individual applying the tools, depends on the situation or the job that was performed. In the thinking critical simulation the problem evaluation tools and techniques used are framing the problem, making the decision, and evaluating the decision. These three tools also can be broken down into steps.
The concept of Locus of control which was made by Rotter in 1966 refers to individual differences in people’s beliefs and expectations about what controls events in their lives. There are two extremes: internal locus which is the belief that what happens is largely under one’s own control (associated with the belief that one can control much of one’s life and succeed in stressful or difficult situations). The other extreme is external locus which is the belief that what happens to one is controlled by external factors such as luck and fate (associated with the tendency to face stressful situations with a more passive and fatalistic attitude). There are a few studies that have looked at the relationship between locus of control and independent versus obedient behaviour. Holland in 1967 investigated this relationship when he ran various variations of Milgram’s procedure.
* Cultural barriers include those customs, beliefs or religious attitudes that may cause problems. Economic and social class differences and language variations, as well as age differences, may also be difficult to overcome. Either too high or too low status of the educator (sender) compared to the audience may affect communication. Factors that can be influence communication As we all know
Therefore assessment of each component can be ongoing. CBL is a fluid process with many entry points once the big idea is revealed. Inquiry-based learning. Inquiry-based learning is another constructivist action learning pedagogy. It, too, has its roots in Vygotsky, Dewey, and the other social learning theorist.
How would you communicate these issues and the recommended solutions back to your manager? ................................................................................................. When investigating why team productivity has declined, I would look at several factors that may be part of the cause of the team not working together effectively. Team effectiveness is essential for organisational success and through regular assessment and discussion; teams can diagnose issues and develop solutions to achieve their combined potential. It can be useful to gather data (through surveys, complaints, interviews, meetings etc.)
Despite the differences in context and experiences, Neil and James show relations between elements of identity, which allows a greater insight into the broad idea of identity. The verity that two different characters are able to relate to one another, through external and internal forces, shows a fluidity of identity – and how it can alter for each individual. As a person, or character, matures their identity is forced to adjust due to changes in circumstance. To mature, one must experience a variety of emotions, and these emotions could stem from external events such as relationships or past events. Our identity is a myriad of experiences, or particular events, those both good and bad; and the shaping of our identity can be dependant on these experiences, and the ones we choose to remember and relive.
In sociological terms, however, individual career development is also a product of the constraints on and barriers to choices that individuals might prefer to make. Such constraints can occur because of limitations on individual choice that arise from political conditions or from economic circumstances. Sociological effects on choice also can be seen in family and cultural influences. Families with differing educational and socioeconomic backgrounds tend to reinforce different educational and occupational goals and belief systems related to career choice. Nations and cultural groups also differ in how particular types of education, work, or family roles are valued, and these perceptions tend to be internalized by group members and reflected in their choices.