Duty of Care

653 Words3 Pages
Explain using examples the meaning of the term duty of care Duty of care is a legal obligation imposed on individuals which requires them to adhere to a standard of reasonable care while performing acts that could foreseeably harm others. In a negligence claim, duty of care is the first element that must be proved. It depends entirely on the court to determine if a duty of care is owed exist or should. People, generally, are mostly negligent in their daily lives; however, there are some certain steps required of a right thinking person to must have taken to avert a potential harm to anyone, which a duty of care is legally owed to. It’s entirely up to the court of law to determine if a duty of care exists in some certain negligence cases. Most especially in an economic-loss negligence claim. On the test for a duty of care, in Carparo Industries v Dickman, the three- fold-test was put into test. The three-part test,’’ if the damage was foreseeable, proximity between claimant and defendant, and, if it’s fair to just create a duty of care’’; are what courts uses as points of consideration in determining if a duty of care is owed to a claimant. This test was examined in the Carparo Industries Plc. v Dickman case. The defendant had an account audited that didn’t reflect a previous loss and debts in the bookkeeping records, instead, profits, putting the claimants in a belief that, the company in question is worth investing in. Afterwards, the claimants found out the audited account didn’t reflect exactly the true previous and current status of the company financial dilemma. Based on the principles of the three-part-fold, the House of Lords ruled against the claimant that: the defendant owes no duty of care to the claimant in such circumstances. In reference to the three-part test; the reasonable foreseeability of harm is not a necessary ingredient in the relationship that

More about Duty of Care

Open Document