Dredd Scott Decision

488 Words2 Pages
The Implications of the Dred Scott Decision (1865) The Dred Scott decision of 1865 had many implications on the status of free blacks in the United States, along with the concept of popular sovereignty, and the future of slavery in America. Dred Scott was a slave who moved in with his master in Illinois, a free state. He claimed residence in a free state made him a free man and fought for his freedom all the way up to the Supreme Court. It was ruled that since blacks can not be citizens, they had no right to sue in a federal court. The decision made by the court greatly affected the status on free blacks in the United States because it did not allow them any rights as a citizen, disabling them from advancing in society. They could not do anything because the constitution did not apply to them. This created a lot of confusion and set up a problem for future free blacks and black slaves in the United States. The concept of popular sovereignty was also affected by the Dred Scott decision because people felt they had the right to either reject or accept slavery. The Supreme Court decision in the Dred Scott case negated Popular Sovereignty. It was questioned that if Congress could not exclude slaves from a territory, how could a territorial legislature do so? Until statehood was granted, slavery seemed as unprofaned as freedom of religion or speech or any other civil liberty guaranteed by the Constitution. Finally the case determined the future of slavery in America because the Dred Scott decision drew a clear line of how the government stood on the issue of slavery, and further inflamed passions surrounding an already divisive topic within American politics. While southerners were happy with the outcome, the massive abolitionist campaign to aid Scott led many southerners to claim that abolitionists were anti-southern and thus,
Open Document