Diving Bell And The Butterfly

428 Words2 Pages
Film analysis: The Diving Bell & the Butterfly Part I Sypnosis Jean-Dominique Bauby is the main persona portrayed in the film. This story is based on real life events as dictated by Jean-Do. Henriette Durand is the speech therapist who develops a system to communicate with Jean-Do. Her tireless efforts and probably her good looks humble Jean-Do and he agrees to humor her. Claude Mendibil is the writer assigned by the publisher to take Jean-Do’s dictation. Céline Desmoulins is the mother of Jean-Do’s children. A woman who although separated from Jean-Do she is his moral support. Jean-Do is an accomplished magazine editor. He lives life confident that he has made the right decisions. He has a young girlfriend, he had just purchased a new car and his business was never more successful. In the wake of a heart attack, he finds his body paralyzed, it is only in that state where he comes to one with himself. Part II Analysis (Philosophical commentary). The film is recorded with the intention of demonstrating the story from Jean-Do’s eyelevel. I believe that it also portrays how narrow we really see life. Most of us have 2 open eyes, yet we see only what we want to see. It is only when you can’t use your other eye that you want to. This film also touches on the life and times of an immensely rich person who has his needs and wants within arm’s length. He is surrounded by people who are trapped and lonely and who want to be with him but their affection remains disregarded. He visits his trapped father who remains trapped because he is afraid to go down 4 flights of stairs, in this visit he cares for him but it is clear that he thinks it is silly of him. The mother of his children whom he never wished to marry, stays alone and quietly continues her motherly duties. The film hints of her affection for Jean-Do because she subtly hints jelousy. As he sees

More about Diving Bell And The Butterfly

Open Document