Gary encountered ethical issues when the proposal was submitted that the material could withstand up to 155 degrees which is a stretch because the material could only withstand up to 130 degrees, using STI’s money to test new materials without informing them, withholding information about the age life of the new material and not sending out the technical data ahead of time to the clients so they could analyze it before the meeting allowed the clients to question Gary’s integrity. Gary encountered potential legal and contractual issues related to breach of contract due to the false information submitted in the proposal about the degrees the material to withstand and using STI money to text new materials without telling the clients. Additionally Gary did not communicate with his team or with the clients and was only able to focus on one task at a time. Gary did not utilize any project management tools or processes therefore he was unable to give proper oversight over the project. My recommendation to
Ethical dilemmas arise one being the Lacks family had no idea that a sample of her tumour had been taken and sent to George Gey. In chapter three, Henrietta goes for her diagnosis and treatment and signs an operation permit form. I agree Dr. TeLinde’s research was important but not justifiable because he did not properly let his patient be conscious that her cells would be used. One questions whether or not appropriate consent was given because there was not any proper consent. I believe at least letting Henrietta know what they were doing would be the ethical thing to do.
Ethical Guideline | Milgram (1963) | Zimbardo (1971) | Voluntary participation | The participants were all voluntary as an advertisement was sent out for those who were interested in taking part in the experiment, however they were volunteering for a different experiment so in that sense it was not voluntary as they were unaware of what they were really participating in. | The participants were all voluntary as an advertisement was placed in the local newspaper inviting male volunteers for a study on prison life. | Informed consent | The participants were not able to be given informed consent as if they had not been misinformed the experiment would not have worked or they would have been given consent for the wrong experiment. “Falsely involved in a study of the effects of punishment on learning.” – participants | Zimbardo ensured that all participants were aware of what the experiment entailed. | Confidentiality | Milgram ensured that all participants were aware of the filming process and consented to be on tape as well as that tape being published.
He states that he cant tell lies, yet he tells his father that he wont carry on with investigation and as soon as Mrs Alexander lets him know that she has some information about his investigation, then he turns straight back too it. He explains that the reason he left her before is because ‘she went inside and he didn’t know what to do’. This shows that although he can be quite clever at times, autism still plays a major part in the chapter. He doesn’t know how to socialise with anyone so he simply walked away without saying goodbye because he doesn’t know the good meaning of manners or social equilibriums. To conclude
Therefore, the hospital had no option but to abide with the laid rules. For this reason they had to treat Mr. Bartling and not fall into his wishes. The doctor’s opinion was that Mr. Bartling’s case was not terminal therefore he could live for at least a year if he was “weaned” from the ventilator. However, weaning was not likely due to Mr. Bartling medical and psychological problem that were not under control. It is also argued that Mr. Bartling was not medically fit to make meaningful decision because of his vacillation.
In Alex and Sarah’s first encounter they exchanged simple information. Sarah asked Alex what he did for work, but he was not forth-coming with the truth about his job because he didn’t want Sarah to think he was doing to her what he was doing for his clients. Alex feared that disclosing that information to Sarah would not benefit him at the moment because he really was attracted to Sarah. After that initial meeting with Sarah he had a number of opportunities to disclose the truth about his work, but he chose not to. Alex continued to side-step the issue of his real work.
Oral directives are subject to significant challenge, but written directives are difficult to overturn. The Schiavo case would not likely have occurred as it did if Terri Schiavo had a written living will. So I would urge for everyone to prepare a living will. The principle of autonomy leads to the notion that surrogates should follow the standard of “substituted judgment,” which means making the decision the patients would have made for themselves, but this does not always happen. Michael Schiavo stated that his wife would not have wanted to go on in a persistent vegetative state, yet he waited a long time to make that claim; thus, he could be said to have ignored his wife's wishes and violated her autonomy for many years.
He constantly masks his problems and never deals with them. Sadly, many marriages lack the aspect of communication. In this story, if the couple would have expressed their concerns with one another, there might not have been such “blindness” within their marriage. The wife would recognize and deal with her husband’s self-doubt in regards to her friendship with Robert. Also, if the husband wasn’t using substances every night, he would realize that his underlying problems are not with Robert, but with himself.
Doctors who lack proper training or those who have impairment problems tend to believe that their patients are honest about issues concerning prescriptions. These may include certain issues such as losing prescriptions, or early refills. This, however, only happens when the doctor fails to identify a drug abuse problem in the patient. Another ethical dilemma in the same field occurs when doctors do not disclose full patient history in the medical file of the patient. This may cause other doctors to prescribe the wrong drug thus putting the life of the patient at risk, either due to possible
There is no tool or measurement to evaluate the effect of using decision matrix forms b. For $1.8 million Kent got a market and customer analysis in addition to a banal guideline to enhance communication and interdependence of Kent Chemical International and its subsidiaries. However, Sterling Partner was not able to find out why the previous restructuring attempts failed Q4: a. Morals should recommend not to implement the highly complex matrix forms because they are to time consuming and the effects are not measurable b. However, he should recommend some adaptations concerning his previous world board restructuring attempt in order to make it more effective 1. The adaptations need to involve the results of the market and customer analysis executed by Sterling Partners 2.