By not understanding how a Muslims leads their life in accordance to their religion, allows people to think mistakenly about them especially as to what they hear around them towards Muslims. These false assumptions lead to false accusations encouraging people to believe the worst of Muslims. A simple way to navigate around these improper persuasions is to educate people as well as to bring about awareness for Islam. Informing the public the truth about Islam can eliminate racism, allowing people to judge for themselves what they truly believe is right or wrong. There are many sources as to why Americans believe what they hear about Islam.
This brought about Islamophobia. Islamophobia is the bigotry and intolerance against Muslims (Fredman, 2001). The people especially Americans developed abhorrence and fright towards Muslims that led to fearing and disliking them. Islamophobia is also a practice of discerning against Muslims and not including them in financial, community and civic aspects of the state. The Muslims are looked at as people with no significance common to other cultures, a substandard cluster to the west and a vicious political idea rather than a religious conviction that it should be.
Gerges explains, “Muslims and ‘Islamists’ do not agree on what Islam is, let alone its role and function in governing their lives. Muslims are believers who may or may not be interested in politics, while Islamists are political activists whose fundamental goal is to seize power and Islamize state and society, preferably from the top down.” Within Islamism, there are many different groups. One such faction, militant Islamists, is committing violent acts of terror. Therefore, only a fraction of a fraction of Muslims are perpetuating violence to reach their goals. The vast majority of Muslims do not condone the actions of the terrorists on 9/11,
Of course, this, in turn, led to more poverty and the increase of latifundia because the poor people lost their land to the aristocrats. But the slaves were better off as peasants than as slaves. Christianity was a major cause of the fall of Rome. Although Rome had religious tolerance, Romans, especially Jews, didn’t accept Christianity. A lot of people converted to Christianity because they lost faith in the Romans.
Explain how and why Muhammad was opposed in Makkah (30 marks) The prophet Muhammad preached in Makkah to bring people in the right path and to believe in one god. However, he was opposed in many ways possible by many people mainly the Quraish. There were many reasons why people opposed the prophet Muhammad in Makkah and many were due to selfish needs such as wealth and power. The prophet Muhammad was opposed in many ways such as verbal and physical abuse. The Quraish were the main people to oppose Muhammad in Makkah.
Emperors were not at all glad and felt indifferent to Christianity. How could an emperor promise to a faith which involved the worship of Jesus Christ, an executed Jewish criminal? This faith was also popular among slaves and soldiers, hardly the respectable orders in society. The story of Constantine’s conversion has learned an amazing excellence, which is expected from the point of view of contemporary Christians. They had just emerged from the so-called ‘Great Persecution’ under the emperor Diocletian at the end of the third century.
The spread of Christianity and Islam Differed in their dispersal through political control, but were similar through the ways that these religions were spread through rapid economical trade and societal infrastructure in society. Christianity and Islam diverged in their spread through political conquest and control throughout communities and societies. Christianity was disseminated throughout Europe in a generally calm manner. For example, many missionaries would take pilgrimages to foreign lands and communities to share the ideas and teachings of Christianity. On the other hand, the spread of islam typically took its roots in the middle east and Africa and was brutally violent and aggressive.
On the other hand, religion is now popularly viewed as the antithesis of progress and a real barrier to development and scientific advancement across the board. Despite this, religious piety is resurgent all over the world, especially, and most problematically, in areas that have historically cherished the secular nature of their societies and now feel threatened by the religious identities of “outsider” immigrants that have come to live in their countries since the beginning of the post-colonial period. In France, these immigrants are primarily Muslims from the former colonies of Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco. In a post-9/11 world these immigrants face opposition and discrimination in all realms of life. As minorities and immigrants attempt to integrate into a new life in France while maintaining their religious and cultural heritage, a confrontation with French nativist secularism is unavoidable.
This weird little Jewish sect who were quite a bit different to the regular Jews that Romans were used to. These Christians for some reason would not accept the societal norms in which they lived. They were a very intolerant people. The roman society worked on the basis of pleasing the gods, performing sacrifices to them to get some kind of benefit. The more people that sacrificed the better the chance of benefitting.
Were The Motives Of The Crusaders Primarily Religious Or Economic? Some historians argue that the Crusades were a necessary response by Christendom to the oppression of pilgrims in Muslim-controlled Jerusalem. While some may say that this was the case, others claim that it was political imperialism masked by religious piety, or that it was a social release for a society that was becoming overburdened by landless nobles. Christians commonly try to defend the Crusades as political or at least as politics masked by religion, but in reality sincere religious devotion by the Christians played a primary role in motivating the Crusaders. Obviously, there would have been a variety of motives for each individual Crusader.