Assuming that young, petty lawbreakers may be deterred from braking laws, simply by introducing the possibility of a public flogging, has some flaws to it. Jacoby neglected to bring up, what I would call the perfect argument to this topic. People who already intentionally commit crimes in today’s American society are fully aware of the possible repercussions for their actions. Despite this knowledge they continue to commit crimes that could land them in jail. I could argue that even more crime could result in effect to fewer prisonable offences and more humane forms of corporal punishment.
Their key arguments are: when a youth does something, he doesn’t think twice. This is because their brains are still developing. The youths who commit crimes should be sent rehabilitation, so they do not commit crimes again. Many researchers have come to a conclusion that putting youths in prison with other criminals can effected the mentally, some of those effects turns them into criminals. Now I am going to talk about my point of view.
It is a common place to attach labels to criminals in an attempt to explain and better understand their behaviour through describing them as possessing a certain characteristic trait. There is a varied finding on who exactly commits child sexual abuse, but the most common finding that is present in the majority of child abuse cases is that sexual offenders are predominantly family members or are closely regarded or known by the child. People who sexually abuse suffer from emotional immaturity, low self-esteem, an inability to see harm in their actions and lack the knowledge to control their impulses. Often
Harsh punishment of this kind would serve as a deterrent for future crimes committed. 3. Peace of mind can be brought to those families devastated by these criminals, with the safety of knowing that these people have no possibility of hurting again. 4. With new technology and DNA testing we can be extra certain that the true criminal will be put to death.
In other words don’t worry about rehabilitation just keep the offenders in jail for the rest of their lives and pay the cost of housing, boarding, and punishing them. Their view is that punishment is the deterrent and that we should not waste money on rehabilitation. Second, certain federal prosecutors have the win at all costs mentality. All they care about is getting a conviction. They will withhold critical evidence from the defense team and will resort to immoral if not illegal tactics in their investigation of the offense.
Sex offenders, as a class of criminals, are nine times more likely to repeat their crimes. The high recidivism rate is a problem for the public, potential victims, and the legal system. It would be irresponsible for the legal system to ignore the criminal class known as sex offenders. Sex offenders as a class of criminals are subject to a recurring physiological urge that requires the use of effective restraints that would curb the habitual repetition of episodes producing the harmful consequences to the public. Meaning of Castration “Castration (also referred to as: gelding, spaying, neutering, fixing, orchctomy, ophorectomy) is any action, surgical, chemical, or otherwise, by which a male loses the functions of the testicles or a female loses the functions of the ovaries.
Sex offenders should be supervised. To me, sex offenders are the lowest of the low when it comes to criminals. I believe that someone who violates children and/or rapes cannot be rehabilitated. The want to commit such heinous crimes is an addiction that is unstoppable. Given the chance, a child molester will commit the crime again.
Firstly, we frame the question, and the question will be “Should Carl shoot the two rapists?” then create the maxim, for Carl’s situation will be “When my daughter was raped then I want to see the justice be done, then I kill the men, otherwise they may just get few years in jail only.” Then, the interesting point is universalizing the maxim, so if Carl kills and everyone can kill. Moreover, we should think about the Carl intention. I think this is really unusual thought about killing and justice connection. So think about the universalizing the maxim for two boys’ action if two boys rape people then everyone can rape others without the guilty. Maybe Carl’s situation in Kantianism is more understandable because intention matter not consequence.
I have concluded that substance abuse is a huge contributor to crimes being committed. The lack or decrease in moral intuition and character can cause a person to make bad decisions. This would cause people not to understand the benefits of to abiding to common social values. A person demographics can also play a role in determining whether or not an individual will turn to a life of crime. Government officials, politicians, and courts employees have concluded that individuals commit crimes for private alternatives and they should be punished and held responsible for their actions and conduct.
For the case above which indicates that it is hard for authorities to determine who should be tortured, some would argue that it is better not to let this opportunity to retrieve information from the terrorists flee. However, if we torture them, we are having risks to lose more. Since it is a waste of time to find the evil group from large population, it is better to keep them there as it still works as a slowdown for the rest members of their groups. Their plans and speed might be delayed because of their group member’s arrestment. Consequently, we might even have more time to consume for analyzing what and where may the terrorists’ attacks be.