The first poin of view to this question answer is simply yes. Teenagers who commit dangerous crimes should be punished as adults to protect society from dangerous individuals regardless of age. It sends a clear message to juveniles who commit murder, rape, and assault that they must be accountable for their actions. Many think that teens have the maturity and judgement necessary to make
I do think that courts should consider other factors, like the severity of the crime, the juvenile's previous criminal record and their upbringing, before determining if they should be tried as an adult. But, it should still be the goal of the court system to attempt to educate juveniles, rather than throwing in the towel at the first sign of violence, and sending them to prison with even more violent, hardened criminals. Some say that children who commit adult crimes such as murder should be tried as adults. Then you should be tried as an adult no matter your age. If you take a life from one you should suffer the same punishment if your 15 or if your 43.
Each time he made a mistake he was very close to jeopardizing everything just for acting foolish. Although he was blessed with another chance, they want to emphasize to youth that wise people learn from other people mistakes. They provided youth with a understanding on how mistakes lead to dead ends in the road of life. We Beat the Street shows youth how three intelligent
Once a criminal has been convicted and has been sentenced to do their time, this is where they are able to show society and the criminal justice system that they have learned their lesson from their mistake. Knowing at sentencing that they will be able to get out a little bit earlier if they behave while incarcerated gives the criminal incentive to focus on negative behaviors and change their way of thinking. On the other hand, after sentencing, criminals are also aware that if they cannot behave while incarcerated they will be serving 100% of their sentence. This idea gives the criminal the option and information to avoid stronger consequences therefore deterrence. Parole is granted to convicts who are able to prove they can behave while incarcerated and they deserve another chance to prove that they can be a productive part of society, and hopefully live productive lives
However the deterrence of crime does not rely solely on the idea of discouragement due to the implication of punishment. Juveniles commit crimes for several of reasons, and if the gain from the crime was the only issue that plays in juvenile crime then this sole method would probably work; however there is considerable elements to juvenile delinquency. This delinquency could be due to a juvenile’s culture or environment and that acts as a contributor. It is imperative to learn the particular reason why a specific juvenile has turned to crime so that it may be corrected. This ensures that juvenile offenders may have the chance to rejoin society as productive members.
The main purpose of the Juvenile justice system is to rehabilitate juveniles so that they can become a Contributing member of society and not another career criminal. the main point of this paper is to talk about juvenile crime and juvenile statistics. We need statistics to help assist in the measurement of the crimes that are being committed by our juveniles. When measuring statistics it is very important to understand exactly what statistics is all about.
And if they do, they know they have a better chance of getting off easy because they are tried as teens and not adults. I think we should be tougher on those teens who decide to commit violent crimes. There should be a law that states everyone over 12 years old will be tried as adults. I can’t say it’s going to stop all the criminals together but it will definitely convince potential and actual teenage offenders that committing adult crimes will get you hard adult time. If we were try teenage offenders of violent crime in adult court, adult charges would then force them to think like adults about their actions.
With juveniles, this is even more of a travesty because they enter this cycle at an earlier age. Rather than locking kids away and “throwing away the key,” we need to find ways to keep juvenile offenders in society with us and to guide them on the right path toward education, toward work, and toward stability. It will be much better for the young people and their families and much better for all of us if we’re looking for ways to help youth to lock up jobs and careers than locking them up behind bars. While it seems like this is the best thing for juveniles and their families, it’s also the best thing for the rest of us as well. It’s expensive to house and feed and clothe inmates in prison.
When crimes are committed, the consequences of those actions are enforced by the law and show the public what can happen to criminals. This instates a mind set in people that the laws must be followed in order to avoid the punishment of the law. With this instilled in the brain at all times, it in turn makes a safer community. People will be smarter with the actions and decisions that they make. With the constant thought of what could happen if they do something wrong, the crime rates will go down.
I think suspension can help the delinquent students take responsibility for their own actions without the unpleasant reaction of jail time. Also, the juvenile is required to provide some service directly to the victims. They will have to perform community services after their school time to complete their suspension. So, I think on suspension time they would start thinking more about what they did wrong and start changing their lives. If probation will not change a delinquent student’s behavior, the Student Judicial Court will need to expel these boys from the school.