Impaired and aggressive driving Impaired driving means operating any motor vehicle while you are impaired. Impaired driving can have serious consequences with safety and your driving record. Aggressive driving consiste on different behaviors, such as tailgating, speeding or not obeying right-of-ways. These two types of driving has serious consequences that can lead to injuries or other serious problems. Impaired driving can mean many things, such as driving under the influence or driving while you are over tired.
Prosecutors can sometimes get away with misconduct as it is extremely difficult to prove that misconduct had actually taken place. Often times the prosecutor is viewed as being on the side of justice and as a result it is difficult for the defendant (who is accused of a crime) to turn the tide against the prosecution. Although during the trial both the defense as well as the judge may report a prosecutor for misconduct, this rarely happens as these reports are often dismissed. This is because as long as the prosecutions misconduct does not affect the outcome of the case, then it is tolerated, meaning that a prosecutor can harass a witness or the defendant so long as the harassment did not have anything to do with the outcome of the trial. The fact that the prosecutor works in the interests of the state can be seen as the underlying factor here.
This can cause a person with visionary loss a great deal of distress. They may not be able to see the car and they could walk into the car causing them embarrassment and physical injury/pain. All in all this factors can have a negative
Criminal Minded CRJ308: Psychology of Criminal Behavior Instructor: Eric Radkowski Darlene E. Adams January 18, 2015 Predisposition to Kill The brain is such a remarkable part of the body. There are so many things that can change the dynamics and functions of it. Substance abuse, injury, environment, are all component’s that can change the brains dynamic. However there seems to be evidence that strongly suggest that some individual’s are predisposed to a life of crime. It is known that some individual may have chemical imbalances that may provoke them to commit simple crimes such as theft, or commit crime against other individuals.
There could be a million reasons as to why a person commits a crime. At the end of the day it all comes back to that person personal choice. This doesn’t mean that they don’t know right from wrong. This simply means that they don’t believe that they will be caught and if they are caught, they don’t believe that they would do major time for their crime. I want to bring up specific deterrence.
Ethically the consequences of using a cell phone while driving are guilt, and embarrassment depending on the circumstances. If someone gets into an accident because he or she was using a cell phone while driving, and someone else is hurt, he or she would have to deal with both legal, and ethical
Police Misconduct respone CJS 210 I would define Police brutality as excessive force by an officer to a suspect. For example, an officer grabbing a suspect and throwing them down on the hood of a police car, which is depicted sometimes in films, is an example of police brutality. Unless the suspect has displayed aggressive behavior, or is attempting to flee the scene, this action is excessive force, and unnecessary. The relationship between police brutality, corruption, and other misconduct are usually associated with officers with poor ethics. Education can be a factor in determining if an officer is going to be corrupt.
Criminal Acts and Choices Sandra Garcia Criminal Justice CJA/204 September 14, 2011 Leroy Hendrix, MS Criminals are often categorized or labeled as the bad seeds of society or the rejects and failures. Those are the individuals that make the choice of disobeying the law and decide to live the life of a felon. Those criminal behaviors later on result to becoming habitual and progressive towards severe crimes being committed. However, for every action there is a reason to better understand the mind of a criminal certain theories have been introduced to the criminal justice system to gain knowledge in why people commit crime and what can be done to prevent it from occurring. In this paper choice theories will be identified and how they
Society has a tight control on the decisions people make. People like to say they are not concerned with the opinions and views when they really are. If society views an individual as negative, that individual often views themselves as negative. It can easily be said that a person is and always will be what society says they are. When an individual commits a crime against society they are labeled as a criminal.
All of these factors may be predictors of law breaking and crime in general, but could also be related to law enforcement officers. Officers work difficult jobs that are distinctive from many other occupations in that their role gives them the unique access and power that other occupations do not have the liberty of doing. On an every day basis, they break the laws that the rest of society is expected to uphold, they speed, visibly carry guns and are able to personal seize property on a consistent basis. This gives them the day to day opportunity to potentially be deviant. Because officers work in law enforcement it provides an opportunity for their deviance from the law to be justified if there actions are questioned.