Comparisson of Siddhrtha and Alchemist

5113 Words21 Pages
Starting with the techniques of Herman Hesse: Hesse’s style is very different from Coelho’s in that he utilizes complex and compound sentences more often than simple sentences. He tends to repeat aspects in the novel that he wants the reader to remember. For example, on page 9 Hesse stresses the fact that Siddhartha learns from the samanas in this one sentence, “We have learned, and we are continuing to learn. You will be a great samana, Siddhartha. You have learned every exercise quickly, the old samanas have admired you often.” In this one sentence alone, the author repeats the word “learn” three times. Also, to characterize Siddhartha as very curious and very questioning of the world around him, Hesse covers Siddhartha’s wonders on an entire page, page three. At times I feel as though Herman Hesse overdoes this repetitive emphasis. I want to start out with the differences in the main character Siddhartha and Santiago. Siddhartha is a respected member of his society right from the beginning, due to being a son of a Brahman and an attractive and intelligent young man, while Santiago gained respect from his journey to achieve his dreams. In addition, Siddhartha goes about his journey with aggressive questioning of everything that occurs. Santiago continues his quest peacefully and takes in everything that occurs along the way with curiosity, but never aggression. Right away, Siddhartha gains his credibility from his respected characterization, while Santiago gains his through the experiences he faces along his journey. In my opinion, I respected Santiago as a character as he gains it through knowledge on his journey. I find Siddhartha rather cocky and vain, since his questioning during his wanderings came across as aggressive and conceited. How do you guys feel about the character? Now, to compare Siddhartha and Santiago: They both are disturbed by constant

More about Comparisson of Siddhrtha and Alchemist

Open Document