Having the courage to stand up for what one’s conscious says is right, is a pure attribute worth striving for. The quality life of those who defy injustice with be worsened by the fact that you are breaking laws and there will be consequences of those actions. Life is best if you play along with the game and follow the
Many of these factors boil down to personal beliefs and value systems. We were challenged to look at several examples of good Samaritans, vigilantism, civil disobedience and crimes among professionals. As a team we had to compare our value systems with those who had been involved in each of these situations. In the Good Samaritan cases, we had a general consensus that we would like to be a Good Samaritan. In the vigilantism cases, although we could all relate to the frustration involved for the actors, we all agree that one must stay within the bounds of the law to seek out justice.
Human rights only have advantages. Human rights are a standard of principles for all people to not be restrained from what is justified as essential for quality living by virtue of being
Healing is very important not just for the victims but also the offenders. Offenders are encouraged to participate in this process to help them understand the harm and problems that they have caused their victims and to take full responsibility for their actions. It gives them an opportunity to set things right and to make amends for their violations against the victims. This may come as reparations, restitution or community work. Sometimes while fulfilling these obligations the experience may be painful but the main goal is not revenge
General deterrence is a punishment which aims to the whole society from committing similar crimes. This kind of punishment is used to generate fear in the general population through the offender’s punishment. How is Deterrence Related to Humiliation? I believe Deterrence relates to humiliation because it modifies a person for what they had done is wrong; this act deters them from repeating the same crime again. However, this is another way to show others potential law breakers the outcome if they were to commit the offense.
Every individual should be supported and enabled to live in an environment which is free from prejudice and safe from abuse. Your responsibilities under the duty of care are to do everything reasonable within the definition of your job role to make this happen however you must be aware of potential dilemmas that may arise between the duty of care and an individual’s rights. During your work you may find yourself in situations where the individuals you are supporting do not agree with what you believe is best for them. In situations where there is a conflict of interest or a dilemma between an individual’s rights and your duty of care, it is best practice to make sure the individual is aware of the consequences of their choice and that they have the mental capacity to understand the risks involved in their choice. It is their right as an individual to be able to make informed choices about their own lives even if you disagree with their choice.
The effects of discriminations are withdrawals, lack of confidence, self-worthlessness, putting down and belittling 1.3 Inclusive practice promotes equality and supports diversity by engaging the individual in decision making giving them control of the care they require and need. Enabling them to feel a sense of living again. The human rights act is all about respect for and the promotion and fostering of, the rights of individual people
As therapists we know only too well the cost of a life built around the pursuit of vengeance. One generation takes revenge against the previous by punishing the next. The crimes that occur within the secrecy of the family are as serious as those that fill the tabloids and these are often the crimes most familiar to us. But there is continuity between c, censure takes the form of punishment that is unilaterally imposed on the offender. In contrast, restorative justice involves self-censure of the offender, who accepts the harm done, takes responsibility, and expresses remorse.
As such, the law is entitled to create laws that protect the society even if it means infringing on an individual freedom to make his or her own decisions. Hart on the other hand, argued that people’s right to freedom, to act as they deem fit, should be upheld and the only justification for infringing on that right is when the behaviour causes harm to others. This paper argues that an individual’s freedom of choice, to act as
In order to make it aware to the community that offenders have been punished, sentencing makes it clear that punishment is occurring. It has been recognized by the courts that deterrence is considered one of the main purposes of criminal punishment. Corporate crime is taken seriously because it is not only hard to detect as well as it causes harm or loss in some way to the public. The main purpose of creating deterrence was to ensure that the criminal realizing the crime they committed, prevents other people from committed that crime as well as it gives a sense of satisfaction to society that someone is being punished for their crime. The overall goal of retribution is to reduce