Case Study: Guy Turcotte

789 Words4 Pages
CASE STUDY by Nadia P. Chouinard On February 20th 2009, Guy Turcotte, a 39 year-old cardiologist at the St. Jérôme's Hotel Dieu Hospital, stabbed his two children to death, Olivier, 5, and Anne-Sophie, 3, in a house Turcotte had rented in Piedmont, 65 kilometers northwest of Montreal. He then tried committing suicide, unsuccessfully. After an intense 10-week trial, the verdict was decided: Guy Turcotte is not criminally responsible for the double-murder by cause of mental disorder. Thus, instead of serving time in jail, he will be staying in the Philippe Pinel Psychiatric Institute until he is judged safe to be released. As described in the Montreal Gazette, “half of the spectators in the courtroom let out a sigh of relief and half sat in stunned shock” (Montgomery, Verdict). Obviously, this decision did not please everybody, and many moral dilemmas arose. For instance, is it “forgivable” for mentally disabled to commit murder? How do we determine the mental condition of a criminal? If an individual doesn’t know what he is doing is wrong, does it make it right? Many people and organizations are directly involved in this ethical issue. First, the family of Guy Turcotte, more specifically, Isabelle Gaston, is directly implicated in the situation. As the mother of the children, her role is to make sure that nothing like this happens again: “No adult has the right to determine the life and death of chil-dren” (Montgomery, Gaston). Gaston is extremely disappointed in the verdict. Nonetheless, she is aware she has to move on because, like she shared to the Gazette, “[she] wouldn't have been satisfied because [she’]ll never get [her] children back” (Montgomery, Verdict). Second, the justice organization of Quebec is involved because it is their role to make the fair decision of this delicate situation. More precisely, it was the jury of seven women and four

More about Case Study: Guy Turcotte

Open Document