PMP Certification: an add-on on the PMs for better career future: Today the jobs are based on various projects and the success of that projects depend upon the Project Manager. But there have many situations in the companies where even the experience manager fail to lead a project or the project is a complete failure. There are many times that projects are handled in proper way, but it always better to have your experience formalized with a certification. And the Project Management Professional (PMP) certification would be the best choice for you. There are few people who would ask why to have a PMP when you earn a good pay and is at good post.
Introduction The troubles facing the Green Mountain resort are to do with staffing issues /concerns and the problem with turnover. Although the location of the resort is not ideal (located in the poorest area of the state), the management had attracted a group of hard working employees. Yet due to lack of promotion and advancement at the resort, the excellent members of the staff have moved onto other resorts leaving behind the novices and poorer workers. This is where the underlying problem arises, as the staff turnover rate was so high due to new employees having to be hired, that the added training for the variety of assignments staff would undertake was crippling management. This sort the management to find a solution to fix their high turnover rate.
This idea becomes explained with the case of J. S. Minion. While Minion was overly competent when it came to his current position as a maintenance foreman, when he was promoted to superintendent he was seen as “an incompetent superintendent” (222). This example of occupational incompetence while it is accurate shows an injustice that is done to people when they are blessed with the ability to advance in their career and are not given
A good boss makes sure you have the correct hours on your paycheck. A bad boss will hassle you for every little thing that you do. A bad boss will hire you just because he/she has the authority to do so. A bad boss will not give you a chance to succeed into the company and take all the credit for them. I was in a recent situation with a good boss vs. a bad boss.
This perception has a direct effect on employees’ engagement and organizational citizenship behavior towards the goals of the company. Branch employees are not fully committed to the organization (OB, p. 108) therefore the turnover is very high. Contextual: * Recruitment policies: * Managers are hired mostly on “relationships of mutual favor”, and not based on managerial ability or integrity. * Long term personal goals for these people are mainly to flourish their relationships, because that increases their personal value in that market. The goals of the company do not fit managers’ personal goals.
Workplace Flexibility Benefits In today’s business world, employers are looking for those exceptional employees that can become part of their success. This drive for that employee results in serious competition in the marketplace. Employers have found that salaries and typical benefits packages alone might not be enough to get that desired employee. Sometimes, employers do not have deep enough pockets to offer big salaries, stock options, bonuses, etc. Employers are finding that if they turn to workplace flexibility options, they might offer that package that fits the employee’s needs for balance between work, family and health.
The aim of all this is that the payment is not an incentive to excel whereas the profit-sharing does reward collective group while they reduce competition between employees. Hiring process is very important for Human Resource Management because it is responsible of deciding who best fits with the company culture. They craft de interview questions in order to identify the best personality. Southwest don’t allow hiring managers to be informal in selecting process whereas they can be creative. Human Resources managers are the ones who build an image that prospective employees are looking.
Unlike the past, the days of an employee staying with a company for a long term are a thing of the past. But, some companies still believe that tenure is directly related to performance. Confusing loyalty with tenure can severely hurt a corporation. Some companies still rate tenure higher than performance, which can cause a lack of cohesiveness in the organization. Tenure is not synonyms with loyalty, and often just represents compliance and survival (Myatt, 2011).
This is evident with Steve Jobs, he is clearly an outstanding leader, however before he was initially fired, we could see from the sales data that he was not a very good manager. This leads me onto the point that a leader such as Steve Jobs may have a great vision for the future that will turn the company around, but it is almost impossible for the chief executive to do this as a one man job. This is evident in a company such as Virgin, where Richard Branson created a an entrepreneurial vision that turned out to be hugely successful, but to ensure this success occurred and stayed, he had to employ others to support him such as managers, to help run the logistics behind the company and essentially the companies backbones, that ensure it runs smoothly. This would be a seemingly impossible task for a singular person to do as it requires a large range of skills. It is important that for the easiness of change to occur, that the leader and the managers or sub groups within the company work well and flow together.
They all need to have a more different attitude towards their workforce while trying to complete their goals and challenges toward fulfilling the company’s vision and purposes. The advantage out here is that the employees are already committed and loyal to the company therefore, if we study the company well enough, we can say that the company has amazing long standing rules and procedures, the people are punctual, they have a very calm workplace, and they are focused on making high-quality products price as reasonably as possible. But what the actual problem is, is that the company were losing employees because of their tight management control, and they prioritize systems and rules over the employee’s creativity. Therefore, what the company could do is, allow the workers to work in a more relaxed environment so that they can be as creative as possible. They could also recruit creative talent to help bring in new ideas to the team and strengthen the product development team.