2. Compare the benefits of growing genetically modified (GM) seeds for crops with the potential negative consequences of using them. The benefits of growing GM seeds for crops is the ability to grow more crops on less land and also apply the chemicals to the entire field where it kills the weeds but spares the crops. Other benefits of growing GM seeds is the ability to kill
Monsanto has done some very unethical things in the many years that they have been producing products. All unethical situations come with a price and it is at the price of the stakeholders and how they look at. Monsanto also has the positives and the negative that come with a genetically modified crop seed and the potential to harm the animal life. When the Monsanto Company started the business in 1901, they started out making the sweetener and then quickly went into making plastics and its own agricultural chemicals and rubbers. When the company hit the first of many legal problems, it was with the chemical Agent Orange.
This pollution has since affected their health and has resulted into more cancer deaths, miscarriages, defects in births, dying of livestock and the sick fish. The attempts to solve the problem and prosecute those involved have proven futile since the county‘s judicial system is marred by corruption. The company was required to clean up its mess and pay for the damages. The toxic waste dumped in the area is believed to be of an estimate of 18 billion gallons, and its remains are still present to date.The company that took over the ownership from Texaco was later ordered to pay eighteen billion dollars for the damages. This was to act as the reparations for the
-Compare the benefits of growing GM seeds for crops with the potential negative consequences of using them. It is a very sensitive topic that deserves a deep analysis and comparison made by professionals in the matter. According to the case, even though, The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or USFDA) has declared that the Genetically Modified (GM) food is safe to consume and studies made by the New York Medical College have stated that Monsanto products, such as Roundup, are not risky for the human
While many people support the organic method because of its known benefits, others feel that it is an exaggerated industry that cheats consumers out of their money. Recently many studies have challenged those critics. These studies substantiate that Organic food is a better choice than conventional because it is better for the environment, avoids the use of chemicals, and is generally more beneficial. To help keep crops from being destroyed, conventional farmers use many methods such as pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides. Nearly 1 billion pounds of these chemicals are used every year (“pesticides”).
2. PROBLEM Plants need different elements that are presente naturally in the environment like Nitrogen, Potassium and Phosphorus and many other elementes. To improve this growth, gardeners use fertilizers to produce larger flowers and richer vegetables and are also used for a thicker and nicer lawn. Some fertilizers are made from organic materials, while others are made from synthetic or industrial compounds. Industrial fertilizers do not always have all the elements a plant needs, they are expensive and if they are used with no guidance they could harm the soil and water sources, therefore our environment.
At this time, there are still a lot of things unknown about GMOs and how it affects humans and the environment and going organic is the best option right now. Genetically modifying our food does have its advantages. The human population relies on food. If there is less food, the population declines, if there is more food, the population grows. This has happened throughout history.
When Company Q finally started offering better quality and more health conscience and organic food options after years of their customers requesting that they do so. Company Q finally offered a limited selection but raised the prices of these products being sold. This allowed Company Q’s profit to increase but in return they started losing the consumer loyalty. When the local food bank ask for the donation of day old products, management declined and decided to throw away the food. Their position was lost revenue due to possible fraud and stealing by their own employees.
There were several factors that created this general distrust. One of these factors included America’s continued presence in Vietnam when funding was out of the country’s budget. On top of warfare spending, President Johnson implemented and Congress supported a number of much needed domestic programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, and Federal Education spending (“Great Society,” 2009). However, as taxes were not raised to help support these new programs, President Johnson’s Great Society agenda resulted in inflation and an incredible contribution to the federal debt. Another event that impacted the public’s view of government dishonesty during this time was President Nixon’s involvement with the infamous Watergate scandal which eventually led to his resignation on August 9, 1974.
Terracing is an inexpensive way to increase land supply compared to other ways such as land reclamation but it is hard to construct and need a lot of human energy and time to cut steps into hills or maintain after construction. In China, Yunnan province, people build the Hani terrace which successfully turned hilly areas to arable land, maximizing agricultural land use and it even boosts up the rice production of that area. Terraces do not cause as much environmental impact as land reclamation or land clearance, moreover, it even helps to prevent soil from being washed away and protect the soil layers. Terrace construction is often accompanied with irrigation system, watering of crops through artificial means, thus enable farmers to grow crops in areas that experience water shortage hence increase supply of arable land. The irrigation system is so powerful that it promotes desert agriculture.