Louis XIII and Louis XIV both claimed to rule by divine right. Both strongly believed in how they ruled their kingdoms and showed that they wanted as much power as they could attain. Both kings always had the final decision for everything and one thing Louis XIII decided to do was go to war against Spain for balance of power. Louis XIV built Versailles because he wanted a magnificent place for all the powerful people to live because he was paranoid. These two kings got to do whatever they wanted since they were ruling with Divine Right.
However, the most accurate assessment of Bonaparte’s intentions as leader most probably lies somewhere in between these two views. He was undoubtedly ruthlessly ambitious, but nevertheless, as an autocratic leader, made his own ambitions and desires synonymous with those of France and its people. Tulard (C) is no doubt the most forceful in claiming that the personal benefits which arose from making France a more stable, and thus more prosperous country, had always been Napoleon’s primary motivation from the very outset. However, a number of flaws in his argument are apparent, particularly the fact that he neglects to consider the desires of the French population; a strong government capable of restoring much needed political and
Firstly, rulers in early modern Europe wanted complete control over the religions practiced in their states. William Prince of Orange was one of those that wanted the same religion basically to stop their enemy Spain from coming in and taking over. That way they would be held together in a peaceful accord and be able to fight against all dangers, he thought this because of his position as Prince has showed him the things that could happen to a nation that fights in itself (2 pov). Paul Hay du Chastelet thought that a king should maintain the religion that he obtained from his ancestors. He believed this because he was a political writer and aristocrat who was born into these beliefs (7 pov).
While some may argue that other philosophes such as Rousseau or Montesquieu impacted the revolution the most, the enlightened thinker that influenced the French Revolution the most is John Locke. Locke’s influential teachings impacted the revolution not only directly, but indirectly as well. In Declaration of Independence, (U.S. 1776), Mr. Jefferson wrote ”We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Compare this to John Locke’s “… that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions…” (Locke, The State of Nature) which is also very similar to article two of the Declaration of the Rights of Man, “2. The aim of all political association is the preservation of the natural and
Thomas Jefferson actually had based the Declaration of Independence, which is still used and referenced today, off of John Locke’s and Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s theories and beliefs “that all men are created equal…that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” (Jefferson). Montesquieu, author of The Spirit of the Laws, had suggested the separation of powers. The separation of powers was a form of way to control power within the government, such as; having three branches of government in the United States has helped in keeping the power very limited. Then, there was Voltaire, which has been easily said to be the most popular Enlightenment thinker, who had stated that the government cannot take away nor limit a person’s freedom of religion and speech. In the formation of the United States, this was very pressed upon, because it carried the sole-purpose of what the United States wanted to be or pictured themselves becoming.
To what extent was Philip II an absolute monarch One could argue that Philip II was an absolute monarch as he was the King, not only that but the most powerful King in Europe as he had control of parts in South America such as Mexico and also parts in Italy, Sicilia and the Netherlands and for a short time England. As a King it meant he had the ‘divine right’, which meant that he had the right to rule from God and were accountable only to God. As a King he had the power to create war and peace, which he did against Italy in 1556. Furthermore he was in charge of an immense military power. The Spanish Armada in 1588 alone had the size of 160 ships and he was able to push back the Ottoman Empire under Suleiman the Magnificent, ending their threat in the Mediterranean in 1585.
“One King, One Law, One Faith.” Louis XIV declared his goal was “One king, one law, one faith.” As an absolutist ruler, Louis centered the country around himself, and was very successful in his goals. Louis glorified his position as the king, achieving the “One king”, limited the powers of others, achieving the “One law”, and united the French religion as one, achieving the “One faith.” During his reign, Louis XIV was very successful in accomplishing this central, powerful French monarchy. To achieve the idea of “One king” in France, Louis glorified himself as an absolute leader and performed wonders to to France’s civilization. In 1682, Louis relocated his palaces to Versailles, which was magnificent enough to be the home of a god. The size of the city and the beauty of the city amazed Europe, and they proclaimed his authority.
Explain why Henry IV issued the Edict of Nantes in 1598 In 1598, Henry IV issued the Edict of Nantes in order to grant the Huguenots of France their own substantial rights. The Edict offered many concessions to the Huguenots, including amnesty and the reinstatement of their civil rights, as well as the right to work as anything and to bring grievances directly to the king. It marks the end of the religious wars that had afflicted and caused great destruction for France in the sixteenth century. Individual people had become embroiled in the wars, especially normal people whose lives had been destroyed in a multitude of ways for the past thirty years, leaving some families penniless. Angered men were coming together to protect themselves and what they had left, willing to attack anything perceived as a threat.
Judgment Day In Politics Derived from the Holy Writ, Jacquest Benigne Bousset endorses absolute monarchy, insisting that it is both scripturally mandated and historically justified. His treatise describes both the rights and responsibilities of monarchs who, according to divine right theory, have been sent to carry out God's will on earth. In many ways the French king Louis XIV serves as a living example of Bousset's divine right king, but he fell short of a perfect embodiment of this monarch because, while he certainly accepted the rights of "God's lieutenant," he did not fully embrace the responsibilities of restraint required of the divine right king. Louis clearly understands Bousset's mandate that the king demand conformity and obedience. In the third paragraph of our excerpt, Bousset states that "the person of the king is sacred, and .
This allegiance derives the King's authority from his inheritance and the common knowledge that this is the way the political order in the country should be determined. Henry has substituted this for his own power and become king, not from any legitimate, traditional claim but simply because he has a military superiority over the legitimate king and the desire to get rid of Richard. The usurpation of Richard II leads to serious repercussions such as an uprising of Welsh supporters of the slain King against Henry IV. However, the play additionally investigates the theme of honor and the character development of Prince Hal. The following essay will detail how far "Henry IV Part One" is a play that explores the consequences and civil