Religious Toleration in Europe Dbq

737 Words3 Pages
Religious toleration in between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries varied greatly between the leaders during this time period; some wanted complete control over the religions practiced, some wanted some control with some freedom, and other leaders wanted complete freedom of religions. In the previous modern Europe, many states churches had been established by the rulers. Therefore, as a result of the Protestant Reformation, many states had a several religious minorities. Which lead to many different catastrophes that affected Europe in a negative way, people started to revolt and protest the ruler’s management of the states. Firstly, rulers in early modern Europe wanted complete control over the religions practiced in their states. William Prince of Orange was one of those that wanted the same religion basically to stop their enemy Spain from coming in and taking over. That way they would be held together in a peaceful accord and be able to fight against all dangers, he thought this because of his position as Prince has showed him the things that could happen to a nation that fights in itself (2 pov). Paul Hay du Chastelet thought that a king should maintain the religion that he obtained from his ancestors. He believed this because he was a political writer and aristocrat who was born into these beliefs (7 pov). King Louis XIV wanted his people to follow the Catholic faith and do away with the Protestant religion; he revoked the Edict of Nantes. He forbid the exercise of the Protestant religion in any place or private house (8). All of these people go together because they had the same mind set on keeping the religion in one's state the same. Secondly, Kings and Priests in some states allowed some freedom but with limitations also in their states/cities. A contract between the Catholic church and the council of Bautzen stated basically that the
Open Document