Biological Therapies For Schizophrenia

1359 Words6 Pages
Describe and evaluate at least two biological therapies for schizophrenia (8+16) One biological therapy for treating schizophrenia is the use of drugs that act on neurotransmitter pathways in synapses in the brain. There are two common types of drugs used to treat schizophrenia: conventional/typical antipsychotics and atypical antipsychotics. Typical antipsychotics reduce the effects of dopamine and so reduce the symptoms of schizophrenia. They are dopamine antagonists in that they bind to dopamine receptors (particularly the D2 receptors) but do not stimulate them, thus blocking their action. By reducing stimulation of the dopamine system in the brain, antipsychotic drugs such as chlorpromazine can eliminate the hallucinations and delusions…show more content…
This involves damaging the brain in order to bring about behavioural changes. Treatment was developed in the 1930s with attempts to separate the frontal lobes from the rest of the brain (frontal lobotomy). It was noticed that the symptoms of schizophrenia reduced or disappeared. More efficient methods of lobotomising were developed and the procedure applied more widely, with ultimately tens of thousands of operations conducted before it waned in popularity. Nowadays psychosurgery is used only in very exceptional circumstances. Many studies using MRI scans have evaluated the appropriateness of psychosurgery and have actually shown that there is abnormal functioning in the frontal lobes of the brain in schizophrenia sufferers, and therefore it may be that some kind of psychosurgery that reduces the functioning of the frontal lobe may actually help to control the symptoms of some sufferers. Tooth and Newton (1961) reported on the effectiveness of psychosurgery carried out between 1942 and 1954. Few sufferers (4%) had died of the surgery, and at least 69% showed improvement of some kind, 41% significantly so. They stated that it is therefore very effective. However, it has been said that psychosurgery does not ‘cure’ sufferers, but it can often reduce their symptoms in the same way alcohol ‘cures’ anxiety and stress- the symptoms are not removed, they are just permanently…show more content…
Critics argue that once its side effects, deaths and psychological consequences were taken into account, a cost-benefit analysis of its advantages would most probably be negative. Furthermore, a very serious problem with this method of treatment is that it is totally irreversible. Once it has been carried out, it cannot be undone, meaning that the side effects are permanent. Indeed, whilst there are many reasons for a drop in popularity of psychosurgery, one contributing factor was the often serious nature of its side effects. Major loss of memory, emotional disturbance, loss of creativity, personality change, lack of social inhibition have been recorded. As a result, treatment is basically no treatment at all. Since the treatment comes with a large amount of very serious side effects (even including death) and very few positive effects, the therapy has been vastly discredited, leaving drugs as the most popular biological therapy in terms of treating
Open Document