Avi Shlaim and the 1948 Arab-Israeli War

504 Words3 Pages
In “The Debate About 1948”, Israeli writer Avi Shlaim lays out parallel versions of the causes, events and aftermath of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. Focusing on six critical areas of political and military contention, Shlaim provides the reader with traditional and revisionist (the writer’s position) viewpoints on what many Israelis call the War of Independence- and what many Palestinian Arabs refer to as al-Nakba or the disaster. This essay will address three of these points and attempt to break down the thrust of Shlaim’s article. First, there is the role of Great Britain in the War. It is well known that the withdrawal of Britain from Palestine exposed Zionist forces to the invading armies of Egypt, Transjordan and other Arab nations. Traditional Zionist accounts interpret Britain’s final actions in Mandate Palestine through the lens of anti-Semitism, accusing Britain of forging a secret, sinister alliance with the Arab states to wage war on young and fragile Israel. However, analysis of English, Hebrew and Arabic documents has produced an altered, revisionist theory: Britain felt that a tiny Palestinian Arab state, undoubtedly under the influence of radical leader Hajj Amin al-Husayni, could not hope to survive on its own. Thus, British policy aimed at the incorporation of the Palestinian Arab territory into Transjordan. Issue #3 is the balance of arms in the War. Traditionalists paint the Israeli victory as a classic underdog story, a victory “achieved in the face of insurmountable military odds” (Shalim 294). The Jewish population was significantly less in number than the Arab population in Palestine and was utterly trumped by the 40 million Arabs living in the surrounding states. But old historians somehow fail to recognize the considerable military advantages of the Zionist forces. Many officers in the Haganah had received training from the
Open Document