I believe that this reason and many other reasons should steer us as a country to consider finally lowering the legal age of consumption of alcohol. As I was saying above, college students that want to drink alcohol are going to do so no matter if they are of legal age or not. To be quite frank I can’t think of very few people I know that do not drink. This is true even though underage students run the risk of being
People find it bizarre that the tobacco age is 18, but the drinking age is 21? People care more about alcohol than they do tobacco products, but tobacco is one of the leading killers in the U.S. today. Allowing 18 year olds to start ingesting tobacco products, such as cigarettes or chewing tobacco, at the age of only 18 will give them an earlier start to becoming addicted, and in the long run, shorten their life span. Some think it is absurd letting people smoke, but they cannot go out with friends and drink. Smoking and drinking are both addictive and can have negative effects if used improperly, but smoking one cigarette is more harmful than drinking one beer.
The first point people have against lowering the drinking age make is that most 18-year olds are mature enough. They believe that young adults do not know when to stop and that they will just drink until they have alcohol poisoning. The second point opposes make is that lowering the drinking age will create alcoholics. They believe that even at 18-years old people are susceptible to gaining a dependence on something like alcohol. If the drinking age is 21 then by that time they will have a strong mind to not be dependent.
Just like it is given the right to vote, go to war, and get married among many other things it should also be given the right to drink since they are considered adults. In conclusion I believe that lowering the drinking age to 18 years-old would be a good idea. The fact of considering a person old enough to vote and go to war, which are major decisions and not to drink makes no sense. If considered an adult it should be in
When it comes to the law there is always an opinion, some are for it and some are against it, currently the legal drinking age is 21. Approximately 5,000 people each year under the age of 21 die as a result to underage drinking. 1,900 of these deaths occur from motor vehicle accidents. 1,600 occur as a result of a homicide. 300 deaths occur from suicide.
Why? Is the main question asked? Many Americans believe the underage drinking age percentage would drop if the age is lowered. Some reasons of why Americans under 21 drink: peer pressure, enjoyment, etc. But the main reason for doing so is “breaking the law.” 87% of high school seniors have used alcohol.
Various individual s such as students and adults think that lowering the drinking age would have a positive effect more than a negative one. However there should be no debate about this argument if keeping the drinking age at 21 saves lives. Certainly, it is evident that an excessive amount of people drink before the age of 21; thus, countless number of people do feel that the only way to stop this thing called underage drinking would be to lower the age to 18. Unfortunately, over 100 college presidents have chosen to address the issue by signing onto a group called “Choose Responsibility, whose key purpose is to lower the drinking age from 21 to 18 (Laura Dean-Mooney 1). It is obvious why college presidents want the drinking age to be lowered because it is one less thing they have to worry about.
However many of them had opinions, but no facts to back it up. I realize that many people under the age of 21 cannot handle alcohol. I believe that at the age of 18 you should be able to consume, and purchase alcohol. If you’re able to smoke cigarettes or fight for your country there is no reason why you shouldn’t be able to drink. Substance abuse is a huge factor, but that is the choice the user made.
Is it right for those 18-20 to be denied alcohol consumption? Are they responsible enough to consume it? Despite the opposition insisting that drinking earlier on will only lead to potential harm for those under 21, an 18 year old is considered an adult, can serve in the military, can vote, and ultimately, should be allowed to make his or her own choices regarding alcohol consumption. As Ruth Engs, a professor of Health Sciences at Indiana University once stated, “the twenty-one year old drinking age law is not working, and is counterproductive, it behooves us as a nation to change our current prohibition law and to teach responsible drinking techniques for those who chose to consume alcoholic beverages (Eng, 1999).” To make an educated decision on the debate, however, both sides of the argument need to be evaluated. Why should the drinking age stay at 21?
Plus teens wouldn’t be as broke, because they are not getting in trouble by the cops and getting minors. By getting a minor, it can ruin their whole life. If one got a minor in college, it may prevent them from getting a very good job in the future, it they were to look at their record. Which they may think is very sad, because one mistake when someone is young can ruin their whole life. But people that vouch for the drinking age to be lowered to 18 tend to forget that the body and brain is not fully developed