There are many conflicted ideas about whether to allow citizens to get free healthcare services or not. To advocates of universal health coverage, they believe that all citizens should have an equal chance to get free access on universal health coverage. Nevertheless, to the people who stand strong on their feet against the universal health coverage perceive that the concept of receiving free access to health care services is quite unfair to health-conscious citizens. Hence, This controversial perception has been put on floor for discussion and debate. This essay aims to explain that we should eliminate the use of universal health coverage or free access to healthcare services for a number of reasons.
The other problem is that there is not enough treatment here in American Samoa to cure our people, so the option for other people is to pay their air fare and go to the state in searching for the treatment that they need. Last issue is the expenses of medicine, most people rely on it to live but they could not afford it if there is not enough money. Hospital bills expenses are basically the problem that will not let other people be in the hospital. They can get stressed by figuring out a way to eliminate the bills so they could be eligible to get help from the hospital again. There should be a way to help the community on these there needs for paying their bills.
Health Care: U.S Health Care Timeline Drugs and life-saving medical operations and procedures provide to everyone a better, longer, and healthier living. In America, the uninsured people have it rough when it comes to having affordable health care services. It has been about a century since America started debates on health care reforms and adoption to have everyone included in the program. A U.S health care timeline allows one to see and learn how the congress has handled the issue of America’s health care cover for its citizens over the decades. The year 1965 was the year that saw the signing in into law Medicare and Medicaid programs.
Basically Socialized Medical systems are designed to eliminate the insurance industry and marginalize profit while providing health care for all. Socialized Medicine has been around for centuries, although not recognized as such, many people in America have given it a very negative connotation. Socialized medicine is too often associated with socialism and in America’s political arena it has long been rejected, thus an opportunity for a National Socialized Medicine program continues to be just a dream for those that believe in the idea (Ausman, 2007). Often people forget that America already supports socialized medicine to a small portion of its citizens. That is, the Veterans Administration’s health care services and the active duty and reserve military force are covered by a socialized medicine program.
Penalities would be reduced reimbursement from centre of medicare and medicaid services. As 2014 is fast approaching it is a challenge for the hospitals. Organizational anfd individual barriers to change could be: Financial- The cost of implementing eletronic medication record system is expensive and it was the question in the minds of organization would it be affordable? Start up cost was the major concern to electronic medication record adoption.On going cost includes long term expenditure for maintainenece , modifying and upgrading system Electronic medication record system.Uncertainity over the return on invetment was a concern for physicians, they believed
A well-organized, efficient health care system is not that easy to provide and one of the key problems on the way to the ideal hospitals and medical help is proper funding. Nowadays, there are three basic types of funding: private, insurance and state. Nevertheless, many people believe that the government must bear full responsibility for providing the money our
However, this is not always the case for all Canadians. Secondly, many leave due to the fear of dying before they can get their organ transplant and last but not least some Canadians leave due to accessibility of certain treatments such as the liberation procedure and cheap cost of cosmetic surgery in developing countries. Medical tourism is a rising industry, in which residents of wealthy countries leave their home to receive medical care from other countries for a variety of reasons. Wealthy Canadians can get treatment from United States but those with limited financial resources search for cheap alternatives in developing countries (Turner, 2007, p.71). Medical tourism has a negative effect on the Canadian health care system because of patients leaving out of the Canadian jurisdiction and also due to the ability of providing efficient health care to the returning patient.
The NHS, which stands for National Health Service, is the world’s largest publicly funded health service, which it has grown to from its launch in 1948. It provides free healthcare to UK citizens depending on their health and need for healthcare rather than their ability to pay for it. Funding for the NHS comes directly from UK citizens’ taxes, and is granted to the Department of Health by Parliament. When it was launched, It had a budget of £9 million, which is now about £108.9 billion. The NHS does not just cover medical healthcare, however.
On the other hand, a person who may live in a public health care system may only have to worry about being right there by his side, and not have to worry so much about the money that will have to be put into the bills. One subject that has been an on going discussion in the United States has always been health insurance, or which kind is the best for a country. People in the United States have contemplated whether we should switch from our private health insurance systems to a public healthcare country. Is it too harsh on a country to switch? Would it be better for the United States?
The United States health care system is a market based system where most of our citizens have some form of health care, but this health care is not universal or provided to all of its citizen like that of the British health care system (Barton, 2010). Britain’s health care system is universal and comprehensive. It is based on a single-payer system and it is funded by general revenue. Ten percent of the British population carries their own private insurance and this coverage is comparable to that provided through the NHS, but this gives these citizens the access to better care and shorter wait times (Tanner, 2008). All British citizens are covered by health care unlike the United States where approximately twenty percent of our population has no form of health care coverage.