A Radical Revolution

1911 Words8 Pages
Seen as the birth of our country, the American Revolution was clearly a transforming event. In 1776, the colonists revolted against their mother country, Great Britain, after years of discontent due to unequal representation in Parliament and in the colonists’ eyes, unfair taxes. They were not only fighting for independence, but also for a new type of government, a republic rather than a tyranny. Indubitably, America experienced extreme political changes; even so the colonists experienced unexpected, radical social change as well. The American Revolution transformed the social relationships between people, placing an emphasis on the common, independent man rather than just the elite. Some historians argue a more traditional interpretation that…show more content…
Historians who follow this interpretation believe that the Revolution was for the purpose of creating a natural rights republic, a government whose main responsibility is to protect its citizen’s inalienable rights, life, liberty, and property. A natural rights republic stems from the ideas of John Locke, saying that a legitimate government is one that’s power derives form the consent of the government; these radical ideas are demonstrated in The Declaration of Independence (Gibson Lecture). In the summer of 1776, the Declaration of Independence published by the Continental Congress, issued American independence from Britain and justified their actions to do so. The Declaration consisted of four parts: an intro, philosophical content, a list of grievances, and the declaration itself. In the introduction, the framers blatantly stated, “all men are created equal”, while discussing the citizen’s unalienable rights and the importance of consent of the governed. Then the framers justified independence by saying it is the people’s duty to abolish any sort of unfair government and to reduce despotism, so that no single entity has absolute power (Doc F). The Declaration provided the framework to establish a new type of government in America, and clearly the framers wanted the new government to be nothing like the one in England. So…show more content…
Historians debate that the framers of the constitution were all rich, elitist men only looking to protect their own economic interests and power, not the majority of society’s interests. Linda Grant DePauw published an article in an issue of Maryland Historical Magazine arguing that only fifteen percent of Americans actually gained freedom because of the Revolution. The Declaration of Independence and Constitution only give power to white males with power. Negroes, servants, women, minors, and men without property essentially gained no freedom from the Revolution primarily due to their lack of right to vote (Zinn 248). For example, Abigail Adams wrote to her husband John, during the writing of the Declaration to encourage him to include the rights of women, arguing that men have turned into tyrants in the past (Doc D). Although Abigail proved herself to be very intelligent John did not listen to his wife’s requests and women received no voice or representation in government under the Declaration or Constitution. Women along with other minority groups were not impacted at all by the Declaration of Independence because they were not included; only the fifteen percent of the population, or the white men with property experienced any sort of radical changes. Historians feel the
Open Document