However, this fault does not necessarily mean she is actually criminally culpable of murder. In murder, once Actus Reus has been established Mens Rea must also be satisfied. Mens rea being ‘malice aforethought’ which can be established by “foresight of death or grievous bodily harm as virtually certain.” Therefore, to sentence Dot with murder it must be established that she foresaw either the death of the children or their grievous bodily harm as virtually certain. Considering she had no knowledge that the children had been poisoned and did not intend the events to happen, simply thinking they were suffering from a stomach ache; it is unlikely that the jury would find intent under the Woolin test. Nonetheless, if the jury did not find the necessary Mens Rea, she could instead be charged with the crime of manslaughter, which is committed when a defendant commits the Actus Reus of homicide but the killing is not sufficiently blameworthy to warrant liability for murder.
12 Angry Men Essay Eric Juror #3 was the antagonist throughout the story, he argued with everyone and stuck to his belief throughout the story. Juror #3 was also biased and very angry with all the other jurors, and that impacted what others thought about him, but towards the end of the movie juror #3 has a emotional breakdown and showed everyone why he was being biased and angry. Juror #3 was very opinionated, rude, and has hidden sensitive side. Juror #3 was very opinionated he crossed over the line into insensitivity and rudeness about the defendant being guilty. His opinions stayed strong threw the whole story until the end when he revealed is true feelings about his teenaged son who causes him to be hateful and opinionated about everything.
Unlike the though police, which could be anyone, anywhere, and is totally undetectable. This is also more insidious than the “two minutes hate” because at least this gives people a way to release their anger. The thought police prevents people from showing their true emotions at all costs, forcing them to keep everything bottled up inside their subconscious. The thought police is the most insidious aspect of the dystopian society of 1984 because the people’s emotions are so controlled by fear and distrust that they forget how to be themselves. “He knew now that for seven years the thought police had watched him like a beetle under a magnifying glass.
We very rarely see past the badges and the colors. We can look into these people's eyes and seemingly look past all the cries for help, until they're finally let out of the bag and we're left disappointed and out of hope. "How could THIS person do THAT?" The Lieutenant (played wonderfully by Harvey Keitel) is a despicable person. He's a crack addict, a heroine fiend, an alcoholic and a sex freak.
When most people think of psychopaths, they think—with a shudder—of serial killers like Ted Bundy, who seem to show no remorse or even understanding that what they do is morally wrong. Psychopathy —also called sociopathy—is indeed defined by lack of empathy, callousness and complete disregard for anything or anyone else other than one's selfish needs. But although all psychopaths meet the criteria for what the diagnostic manual calls "antisocial personality disorder"—of which psychopathy is the most extreme case—not all of them are ruthless murderers. "People don't realize that there are hundreds of sociopaths walking around [who] aren't criminals," says child psychiatrist Bruce Perry, M.D., Ph.D. "They end up manipulating people to get
The misinterpretation of the line “He’d kill us if he had the chance” causes an extreme amount of confusion and drama. There are many flaws in the methodology behind Harry Caul’s form of eavesdropping on the civilians of San Francisco, however to say that the misinterpretation was all his own fault would be quite naïve. A single inflection can change the entire meaning of a sentence. And in Harry Caul’s case, it was a very, very big change. Harry; being a professional eavesdropper, asserts to have an
Violence can be used for good. Evey: What are you talking about? V: Justice (Vendetta). This quote isn’t exactly clear, but it’s referring to how Evey’s loss of innocence pretty much started. V saved Evey and was explaining her how he could have killed those fingerman.
"(Peterson) With new improvements in technology, Quentin Tarantino and many other directors are capable of creating and destroying characters in a brutal, detailed manner. These characters are created as if they were made on an assembly line. Many critics and viewers protest these movies because they showcase non-senseless violence in a repetitive fashion. Other violent movies, such as The Passion of Christ, display violence in a detailed manner, but also offer a message of morality to its viewers. Violence in movies has always been a controversial issue, and author Vivian Sobchack concludes that these movies showcasing violence have no "moral agenda."
The huns were ruthless killers. They had no moral whatsoever and their intent was just to kill. They had the shape of humans but were wild. They were like refugees with no permanent settlement. homes, laws, or even a fixed way of live never existed with the
Are our cities and our governments going to be able to make a change or at least reduce the number of consumers? The flow of drugs into our streets is getting our cities contaminated with thieves, violence and prostitution. The addiction for drugs creates a need that somehow has to be filled. In addition the effect of it doesn’t let the body work nor think in a proper way. Eventually after consuming an unhealthy, extensive amount of drugs, the person would not reason properly and will start to act with a criminal behavior.