Many examples in the book made me consider perspectives that I had never thought of before. In my opinion, this book definitely stirred up a reassurance of my place in society and what can be done to liberate the oppressed. I believe the voices represented in this book can cause negative reactions from some churches because it goes against what is and has been normal. Churches would not really like to change the view of “white” Christ to be a diverse Christ of another race because it would change certain aspects and power. The church is called to be one diverse body of God, but as churches can remain dominant to one race, it becomes difficult to incorporate diversity into what already is established.
Finally, some could argue that the Church still has a very old fashioned view on some of today’s issues such as; Gay Marriage and Abortion. Therefore they are not keeping up with today’s society. The world around us is changing every
Cultural differences number one may entail language barriers; that in itself can make communication difficult. Cultural difference not only is focused on the patient, but on the provider as well. Providers in the states are so diverse and come from all over the country. In my experience with working with different cultured providers, some do not understand the American demeanor and can be very frank and straight forward because caring for a patient is strictly work to them. It is not in their culture to build personal relationships with the patients, they are just respected for their work and that is what they do.
While I do not completely agree with his whole book, Shane Claiborne speaks some truths on many ugly topics of our society. I agree with him that there needs to be a higher concern in our society for the less fortunate, poor, and those who do not have a voice in local government. He speaks for an alternative thinking, conveying an idea that the traditional church isolates itself from the poor and disenfranchises many LGBT people. He communicates to his audience; it is okay to question a church that may be wrong in their views or traditions. I believe our generation subjects themselves to staying neutral on controversial topics.
I believe that racism does operate like a web. An article to support this idea would be Michael O. Emerson’s “Race, Religion, and Color Line (Or Is That the Color Wall?)”. Emerson quoted, “Religion contributes to racial division and inequality, then, in that it increases racial categorization, which is a by-product of congregational segregation” (207). By growing up in a certain area, the majority of American citizens tend to carry out connections with the people they see and share the same beliefs with. It’s going to be hard to overcome this racial segregation if you have grown up with it, but it is something that can be
He has written many books and in this on in particular he criticizes the prevalence of Native American and African American studies programs. His complaints about these programs stem from the fact that “people who support these programs assume that by communicating the best aspects of a group they have somehow solved the major problems of that group in its relations with the rest of society.” His essay makes many comments about the evolution of stereotypes and how certain oppressed groups of people are viewed over time. A quote that would be applicable to a gender/popular culture essay can be found on page 733, “The problem of stereotyping is not so much a racial problem as it is a problem of limited knowledge and perspective.” (Applicable to gender stereotypes as
The color of water essay As I was reading The Color of Water, the book started to unravel and show its meaning and purpose. There were a few things that the author, James McBride tried to show or teach the reader. I believe the most important lesson to be learned is in relation to race and religion. I do not believe that it is a lesson on how to treat people of a different race or religion today, but a lesson on how difficult it was for people of different races and religions in that time. In society today there are still problems of hate crimes towards people of different races and religions.
A personalised induction will always be more effective The human race may look and behave similarly but actually we are unique. We have very different likes, dislikes and our views and perceptions are very varied. Give a group of people the same book to read and everyone’s opinion of the book and its characters will not be the same. One of the biggest steps for a client is actually admitting that they need help; the next thing for the client is finding the right therapy for them. If they choose hypnosis then it is down to the therapist to give the client their very best care no matter what the problem is.
It can also be amongst service users - ie a service user purposefullly not being included in an activity because they have dementia and are unable to interact well with others. It could occur inadvertently when something seems fair but actually excludes a group of people. For example, if a care home decided to organise a religious service for the home because the majority of residents are that religion, this would include people of that religion but anybody else would feel excluded. 1.3 Practises that support equality and inclusion Because everybody has different needs, employers need to be flexible so that everyone can have equal treatment and not be discriminated against. For example, if an employer offers flexible shifts, staff can fit their responsibilities such as child care around their work and not be excluded.
Imagine trying to find a common language for all cultures, races, and religions. To most this would seem like a daunting and almost impossible task. However some rhetoricians choose to use this exact thing to analyze rhetoric. Ideographic analysis uses ideologies as a basis for analyzing an entire text. They find the common culture and language of the time and of the race or social issue at hand and pinpoint words or phrases, other people may not see as common.